1992
DOI: 10.1109/10.148385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-model adaptive predictive control of mean arterial pressure and cardiac output

Abstract: A multiple-model adaptive predictive controller has been designed to simultaneously regulate mean arterial pressure and cardiac output in congestive heart failure subjects by adjusting the infusion rates of nitroprusside and dopamine. The algorithm is based on the multiple-model adaptive controller and utilizes model predictive controllers to provide reliable control in each model subspace. A total of 36 linear small-signal models were needed to span the entire space of anticipated responses. To reduce computa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach does not require a period of open-loop process identifi cation, so closedloop control can begin immediately with the sedation of the patient. Yu et al (1992) solved an unconstrained optimization problem. A constrained version is presented by Rao et al (2003), while implementation issues are discussed by Aufderheide and Bequette (2003).…”
Section: Multiple Model Predictive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach does not require a period of open-loop process identifi cation, so closedloop control can begin immediately with the sedation of the patient. Yu et al (1992) solved an unconstrained optimization problem. A constrained version is presented by Rao et al (2003), while implementation issues are discussed by Aufderheide and Bequette (2003).…”
Section: Multiple Model Predictive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major advantage is that this algorithm is computationally inexpensive. An additional benefit is that the poor models are rejected exponentially and thereby allowing to have a widely varying set of models without necessarily leading to a large drop in controller performance, even during the initial stages [15].…”
Section: A Calculation Of Probability: Bayesian Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controller output is mainly influenced by the controller tuning parameters and error (e) 20,21 . PI control has the integral part to eliminate offset, which is a major disadvantage of Proportional control (P control).…”
Section: Proportional-integral Control (Pi Control)mentioning
confidence: 99%