2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0548(03)00068-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple multicast tree allocation in IP network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar problem was studied for wireless networks [34], but the algorithms and their evaluation are mostly focused on specific properties of the wireless transmission. As long as uncertainty or per-consumer adaptability are not considered, the multigroup multicast algorithms [25], [26] are usually evaluated up to 100 or 200 nodes in the network. Our algorithm was shown to work on bigger instances, supporting uncertain network capacities, per-consumer adaptability, and two-level network representation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar problem was studied for wireless networks [34], but the algorithms and their evaluation are mostly focused on specific properties of the wireless transmission. As long as uncertainty or per-consumer adaptability are not considered, the multigroup multicast algorithms [25], [26] are usually evaluated up to 100 or 200 nodes in the network. Our algorithm was shown to work on bigger instances, supporting uncertain network capacities, per-consumer adaptability, and two-level network representation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the MMDOM is not oriented on multimedia streaming and it considers neither typical QoS constraints nor multiple tree building. The MMTA algorithm was proposed for delay bounded multicast routing with multiple groups [25]. Computational intelligence methods became popular for the multiple groups multicast routing as well [26].…”
Section: B Related Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They assume that each multicast tree requires the same amount of bandwidth and devotes to minimize the maximum congestion. Literature analyzed the similar problem while each multicast tree has different bandwidth requirement. In addition, some researchers reconsider the tree packing problem under different optimization objectives.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ravindran et al [7] developed a model and provided heuristics for the problem of merging two or more tree to minimize overall bandwidth consumption. Chen et al [8] and Lee and Cho [9] developed IP models together with heuristics to merge multicasting trees for maximizing the minimum residual bandwidth. While these researches attempt to construct and pack the trees in the network, for the problem we consider, we are given a set of multicast trees (for different sets of channels) and our goal is to find a way to distribute data throughout the trees while optimizing zap time and bandwidth.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%