2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple myeloma and chemical maxillary osteonecrosis. Can both occur simultaneously?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical features of OM have also been documented to be difficult to discern. OM has been reported as extraoral swelling, 5 non‐healing extraction socket, 20 cortical expansion, 19 exophytic gingival mass, 21 paresthesia 22 and/or fistula through which bone can be probed 22 . Unlike MRONJ, OM does not require exposed bone for diagnosis 5 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Clinical features of OM have also been documented to be difficult to discern. OM has been reported as extraoral swelling, 5 non‐healing extraction socket, 20 cortical expansion, 19 exophytic gingival mass, 21 paresthesia 22 and/or fistula through which bone can be probed 22 . Unlike MRONJ, OM does not require exposed bone for diagnosis 5 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Unlike MRONJ, OM does not require exposed bone for diagnosis. 5 When there is high suspicion for OM, histological analysis from gingival and/or bony biopsy is warranted. Clinicians however must weigh the benefits of the biopsy with the risk for development of MRONJ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 2 diseases have similar clinical manifestations and imaging findings. There are several reports about MM disguised as MRONJ, [7][8][9][10][11] in which the cases were initially diagnosed as MRONJ clinically but were later confirmed to be MM through pathological analysis, while simultaneous finding of MRONJ and MM in same site has been rarely reported. In this report, the patient was previously clinically and pathologically diagnosed as MRONJ, but 1 year later, MM was found pathologically in the surgical specimen that involved with MRONJ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%