2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2008.10055
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Network Embedding for Anomaly Detection in Time Series of Graphs

Abstract: This paper considers the graph signal processing problem of anomaly detection in time series of graphs. We examine two related, complementary inference tasks: the detection of anomalous graphs within a time series, and the detection of temporally anomalous vertices. We approach these tasks via the adaptation of statistically principled methods for joint graph inference, specifically multiple adjacency spectral embedding (MASE) and omnibus embedding (OMNI). We demonstrate that these two methods are effective fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A great amount of inference in the RDPG setting is predicated upon X being a suitably accurate estimate of X, and the key statistical properties of consistency and asymptotic residual normality are established for the ASE in [51,39,48] and [5,4] respectively. These results (and analogues for unscaled variants of the ASE) have laid the groundwork for myriad subsequent inference results, including clustering [51,39,33,49], classification [54], time-series analysis [10,45], and vertex nomination [19,60], among others. In the shuffled testing analysis that we consider herein, we will use the following ASE consistency result from [48,16].…”
Section: Definition 13 (Adjacency Spectral Embedding) Given the Adjac...mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A great amount of inference in the RDPG setting is predicated upon X being a suitably accurate estimate of X, and the key statistical properties of consistency and asymptotic residual normality are established for the ASE in [51,39,48] and [5,4] respectively. These results (and analogues for unscaled variants of the ASE) have laid the groundwork for myriad subsequent inference results, including clustering [51,39,33,49], classification [54], time-series analysis [10,45], and vertex nomination [19,60], among others. In the shuffled testing analysis that we consider herein, we will use the following ASE consistency result from [48,16].…”
Section: Definition 13 (Adjacency Spectral Embedding) Given the Adjac...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We finally present these estimated powers averaged over the outer nM C 1 = 50 Monte Carlo replicates. Results are displayed in Figures 5-6 where we range k = (10,20,30,50,75,100) and different k values are represented by different colors/shapes of the plotted lines. Here ≤ k, the number shuffled in the alternative (i.e., the number of actual incorrect labels in U k,n ) ranges over the values plotted on the x-axis.…”
Section: Empirically Exploring Shuffling In Ase-based Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recurrent Deterministic Policy Gradient (RDPG): It works as an extension of Deterministic Policy Gradient (DPG) and is a robust algorithm in scenarios such as time series forecasting [31]. RDPG and DDPG algorithms differ from each other in handling time series patterns.…”
Section: Time Series Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%