2003
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/13.5.435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-object Working Memory--A Model for Behavioral Performance

Abstract: In a psychophysics experiment, monkeys were shown a sequence of two to eight images, randomly chosen out of a set of 16, each image followed by a delay interval, the last image in the sequence being a repetition of any (one) of the images shown in the sequence. The monkeys learned to recognize the repetition of an image. The performance level was studied as a function of the number of images separating cue (image that will be repeated) from match for different sequence lengths, as well as at fixed cue-match se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
49
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
49
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, retroactive interference in the RU condition is usually reported to be stronger than proactive interference in the UR condition (Cowan 2001). This is the case in the model mainly because at prime2 onset, the perceptual response of the population coding for the prime2 is larger-and generates stronger feedback inhibition-than the retrospective activity of the prime1, as it is the case during the processing of sequences of items (see Amit et al 2003). The different effects of proactive and retroactive interference on the level of activation of RU and UR associates are increased by the spike frequency adaptation of the rates of neurons populations, which makes possible the semantic priming shift between activation of RU associates to the prime1 and activation of UR associates to the prime2.…”
Section: Activation and Interferencesmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, retroactive interference in the RU condition is usually reported to be stronger than proactive interference in the UR condition (Cowan 2001). This is the case in the model mainly because at prime2 onset, the perceptual response of the population coding for the prime2 is larger-and generates stronger feedback inhibition-than the retrospective activity of the prime1, as it is the case during the processing of sequences of items (see Amit et al 2003). The different effects of proactive and retroactive interference on the level of activation of RU and UR associates are increased by the spike frequency adaptation of the rates of neurons populations, which makes possible the semantic priming shift between activation of RU associates to the prime1 and activation of UR associates to the prime2.…”
Section: Activation and Interferencesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the model, the nonselective inhibitory feedback proportional to the global level of activation of the items, sets a limit to the working memory system in which interference occurs when maximum capacity is reached (Cowan 2001;Amit et al 2003; see Haarmann and Usher 2001 for a review). Therefore, the limit of the overall amount of activation implies a selection of which RU and/or UR associates are activated and which are not.…”
Section: Activation and Interferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This in turn requires a model explaining why capacity is limited. Although our understanding of the mechanistic basis of vsWM storage in local cortical circuits has advanced greatly through the integration of monkey neurophysiology data and biophysically detailed computational models (2,(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29), storage of multiple items has only recently been investigated with these techniques (21,22,(30)(31)(32). Neuronal factors that affect vsWM have been identified, but how they interact to determine capacity is unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, when maximum capacity is reached, interference perturbs the processing of the items (Amit, Bernacchia, & Yakovlev, 2003;see Haarmann & Usher, 2001, for a review). The processing of items generates proactive interference that can perturb the processing of subsequent items and, to a larger extent, retroactive interference that can perturb the processing of preceding items.…”
Section: Behavioral Correlates Of Activation and Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cortical network models, excitatory neurons coding for items also activate inhibitory interneurons that provide regulatory negative retro-action preventing runaway excitation of the entire network (e.g., Amit, Bernacchia, & Yakovlev, 2003;Amit & Brunel, 1997). Therefore, in multiple priming, processing of the sequential primes and their activated associates generates unselective inhibition proportional to the overall level of activation.…”
Section: Neural Correlates Of Activation and Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%