2007
DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbm010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple objectives and perceptions of optimal management: The Danish industrial fishery in the North Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weights were given following the effectiveness of the criteria. The weight for each factor was determined by pair-wise comparisons in the context of a decision-making process known as the analytical hierarchy process [ 23 , 25 ], which was also suggested by other authors [ 21 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. The assessment of resilience at each level of the factor was determined from survey findings and professional judgment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weights were given following the effectiveness of the criteria. The weight for each factor was determined by pair-wise comparisons in the context of a decision-making process known as the analytical hierarchy process [ 23 , 25 ], which was also suggested by other authors [ 21 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. The assessment of resilience at each level of the factor was determined from survey findings and professional judgment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed scheme maintains an explicit boundary between scientific and policy decisions: weightings used to make up the scenarios for calculating RSS are negotiable among stakeholders (Kjærsgaard et al . ). With this, “transparent” management objectives can be tailored for different ecosystems to reflect agreed priorities, with stakeholder participation (Mackinson et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our proposal enables this by reducing an inherently multidimensional (and nonscalar) problem to a simple one-dimensional RSS and also explicitly takes account of multiple stakeholder views. The proposed scheme maintains an explicit boundary between scientific and policy 420 1 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year ( decisions: weightings used to make up the scenarios for calculating RSS are negotiable among stakeholders (Kjaersgaard et al 2007). With this, "transparent" management objectives can be tailored for different ecosystems to reflect agreed priorities, with stakeholder participation (Mackinson et al 2011;Link et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach been referred to as generating methods (Mardle and Pascoe 1999; Kjaersgaard 2007). Kjaersgaard et al. (2007) offered another solution by using the MCDM method called analytic hierarchy process (AHP; see below), a formal preference elicitation technique, to more thoroughly specify stakeholders’ positions.…”
Section: Survey Of Risk Management Strategies In Use or Applicable Tomentioning
confidence: 99%