2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-010-0168-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple paternity in egg clutches of hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata)

Abstract: We present the first data collected on the genetic mating system of the hawksbill turtle Eretmochelys imbricata, the only marine turtle not studied to date. We examined paternity within 12 egg clutches from ten female hawksbill turtles from Sabah Turtle Islands, Malaysia. A total of 375 hatchlings were analysed using five microsatellite markers. Results demonstrated that clutches from two out of ten females were sired by multiple males (maximum of two). Although at a low frequency, observation of multiple pate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our values are in broad agreement with other studies (Kichler et al 1999, Jensen et al 2006, Theissinger et al 2009, Hays et al 2010, Joseph & Shaw 2011, including those for Caribbean hawksbill turtles (Leon & Diez 1999, Geis et al 2003, and with Table 1). The secondary sex ratio can be less female-biased than the primary sex ratio (Kichler et al 1999, Jensen et al 2006, Theissinger et al 2009, Hays et al 2010, Joseph & Shaw 2011, Stewart & Dutton 2011, Wright et al 2012a, 2012b, suggesting differential re cruitment by the sexes to juvenile foraging aggre gations. This could be for 2 reasons: either (1) some female hatchlings recruit elsewhere (sex-biased dispersal; Casale et al 2002); and/or (2) female hatchlings suffer greater mortality than male hatchlings.…”
Section: Sex Ratiossupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our values are in broad agreement with other studies (Kichler et al 1999, Jensen et al 2006, Theissinger et al 2009, Hays et al 2010, Joseph & Shaw 2011, including those for Caribbean hawksbill turtles (Leon & Diez 1999, Geis et al 2003, and with Table 1). The secondary sex ratio can be less female-biased than the primary sex ratio (Kichler et al 1999, Jensen et al 2006, Theissinger et al 2009, Hays et al 2010, Joseph & Shaw 2011, Stewart & Dutton 2011, Wright et al 2012a, 2012b, suggesting differential re cruitment by the sexes to juvenile foraging aggre gations. This could be for 2 reasons: either (1) some female hatchlings recruit elsewhere (sex-biased dispersal; Casale et al 2002); and/or (2) female hatchlings suffer greater mortality than male hatchlings.…”
Section: Sex Ratiossupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It was not possible to estimate whether sampling bias may have affected the estimated sex ratios in this study, but these results should not have been influenced by the presence of any adult female nesting turtles, as we only captured juveniles. Our values are in broad agreement with other studies (Kichler et al 1999, Jensen et al 2006, Theissinger et al 2009, Hays et al 2010, Joseph & Shaw 2011, including those for Caribbean hawksbill turtles (Leon & Diez 1999, Geis et al 2003, and with 14 Fig. 4.…”
Section: Sex Ratiossupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For male leatherbacks, these adaptations may include the areas they select to intercept females prior to the nesting season. While all species of sea turtle exhibit polyandry (Kichler et al, 1999;Ireland et al, 2003;Jensen et al, 2006;Zbinden et al, 2007;Theissinger et al, 2009;Joseph and Shaw, 2011), multiple paternity in Atlantic leatherback clutches has been observed in low proportions (10-41.7%; Crim et al, 2002;Dutton, 2011, 2014;Figgener et al, 2016). Few instances of inter-nesting mating have been identified in leatherbacks (Figgener et al, 2016), and successive nests laid by most females reveal consistent paternities throughout the nesting season, indicative of sperm storage from mating event(s) occurring prior to the nesting season (Crim et al, 2002;Stewart and Dutton, 2011;Figgener et al, 2016).…”
Section: Inferred Mating Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%