2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16876.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple populations in globular clusters: the possible contributions of stellar collisions

Abstract: Globular clusters were thought to be simple stellar populations, but recent photometric and spectroscopic evidence suggests that the clusters' early formation history was more complicated. In particular, clusters show star‐to‐star abundance variations, and multiple sequences in their colour–magnitude diagrams. These effects seem to be restricted to globular clusters, and are not found in open clusters or the field. In this paper, we combine the two competing models for these multiple populations and include a … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This simulates the results of detailed stellar evolution models of low-mass merged stars by the use of molecular weight as a proxy for entropy (Gaburov et al 2008;Sills & Glebbeek 2010;Ivanova et al 2013). When a binary star enters a common envelope phase both stellar envelopes are homogenized in the process under the assumption that the orbital energy and angular momentum deposited in the common envelope mixes it completely prior to ejection or merging.…”
Section: Stellar Mass Loss and Gain In _mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This simulates the results of detailed stellar evolution models of low-mass merged stars by the use of molecular weight as a proxy for entropy (Gaburov et al 2008;Sills & Glebbeek 2010;Ivanova et al 2013). When a binary star enters a common envelope phase both stellar envelopes are homogenized in the process under the assumption that the orbital energy and angular momentum deposited in the common envelope mixes it completely prior to ejection or merging.…”
Section: Stellar Mass Loss and Gain In _mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…O-rich and Na-poor stars form the first population, whereas the O-poor and Narich stars constitute the second one. Intermediate-mass asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars (≈6 M -11 M Ventura et al 2001Ventura et al , 2013Ventura & D'Antona 2009D'Ercole et al 2010) and fast-rotating massive stars (FRMS;25 M Maeder & Meynet 2006;Prantzos & Charbonnel 2006;Decressin et al 2007;Krause et al 2013a;Charbonnel et al 2014), variants and combinations of these object classes (de Mink et al 2009;Sills & Glebbeek 2010;Bastian et al 2013;Cassisi & Salaris 2014), and recently also supermassive stars (Denissenkov & Hartwick 2014) have received attention as possible sources of the enriched material. From the nucleosynthesis point of view, FRMS, or massive stars in binary systems (de Mink et al 2009), are perhaps the most obvious polluter candidates: they produce the Na-O anti-correlation directly (Decressin et al 2007), as opposed to AGB stars, in which the direct correlation in their ejecta has to be turned into an anti-correlation by a precisely prescribed mixing procedure (Ventura et al 2013).…”
Section: Light-element Anti-correlations In Globular Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the exact processes governing the formation of multiple populations in GCs are far from being understood and are strongly debated (e.g., Bastian & Lardo 2015;Renzini et al 2015;Krause et al 2016). Competing scenarios invoke different types of possible 1P polluters, namely asymptotic giant branch stars (AGB; Ventura et al 2001;D'Ercole et al 2010;Ventura & D'Antona 2011;Ventura et al 2013), fast-rotating massive stars (FRMS; Prantzos & Charbonnel 2006;Decressin et al 2007a,b;Krause et al 2013;Chantereau et al 2015), massive binary stars (de Mink et al 2009), supermassive stars (Denissenkov & Hartwick 2014), or a combination of some of the above-mentioned polluters (Sills & Glebbeek 2010;Bastian et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%