2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1911.03806
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Pursuer Multiple Evader Differential Games

Abstract: In this paper an N -pursuer vs. M -evader team conflict is studied. The differential game of border defense is addressed and we focus on the game of degree in the region of the state space where the pursuers are able to win. This work extends classical differential game theory to simultaneously address weapon assignments and multi-player pursuit-evasion scenarios. Saddle-point strategies that provide guaranteed performance for each team regardless of the actual strategies implemented by the opponent are devise… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another means of task allocation was proposed in [83] where Awheda and Schwartz proposed a fuzzy logic based decentralized control scheme using the Apollonius circles construct. A formal analysis of both optimal guidance and optimal assignments of N pursuers to M evaders, for N ≥ M , was undertaken in [84]. Finally, the papers [85]- [87] address multiplayer differential games based on numerical solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi-Isaacs (HJI) equations.…”
Section: N Pursuers M Evaders (Nvm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another means of task allocation was proposed in [83] where Awheda and Schwartz proposed a fuzzy logic based decentralized control scheme using the Apollonius circles construct. A formal analysis of both optimal guidance and optimal assignments of N pursuers to M evaders, for N ≥ M , was undertaken in [84]. Finally, the papers [85]- [87] address multiplayer differential games based on numerical solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi-Isaacs (HJI) equations.…”
Section: N Pursuers M Evaders (Nvm)mentioning
confidence: 99%