1985
DOI: 10.1063/1.449344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-quantum dynamics in solid state NMR

Abstract: Recently developed solid state multiple-quantum NMR methods are applied to extended coupling networks, where direct dipole-dipole interactions can be used to create coherences of very high order ( -1(0). The progressive development of multiple-quantum coherence over time depends upon the formation of multiple-spin correlations, a phenomenon which also accompanies the normal decay to equilibrium of the free induction signal in a solid. Both the time development and the observed distributions of coherence can be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
578
2
3

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 395 publications
(592 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
9
578
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…154 In the solid state, MQ (multiplequantum) methods for spin counting have been developed since 1985. 155 On silica, proton MQ-NMR could be used in principle to count the number of silanols interacting in a « silanols cluster ». This technique has been applied to silica catalyst supports 156 but with rather trivial results, namely that all 1 H spins exist in clusters of less than seven silanols.…”
Section: Solid-state Nmrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…154 In the solid state, MQ (multiplequantum) methods for spin counting have been developed since 1985. 155 On silica, proton MQ-NMR could be used in principle to count the number of silanols interacting in a « silanols cluster ». This technique has been applied to silica catalyst supports 156 but with rather trivial results, namely that all 1 H spins exist in clusters of less than seven silanols.…”
Section: Solid-state Nmrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the concepts used to describe multiple-quantum spin counting experiments is 'growth' of a spin network [37][38]. This terminology is misleading, To differentiate between growth of the spin network and an increase in the measured size of the spin network, the size of the spin network measured as a function of excitation time will be referred to as the apparent spin network size, Napp, with the assumption:…”
Section: Spin Clusters and Dipole Coupled Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Napp is determined by performing a two parameter least squares gaussian fit of I(n), with the assumption that Napp accurately reflects the size of a coupled spin network only when the evolution of the density matrix reaches the statistical limit. Indeed, I(n) generally will not be closely approximated by a gaussian distribution before p has reached the -statistical limit [37][38], due to the differing weights of each transition in the multiple-quantum spectrum. Experimentally, N is determined by:…”
Section: Spin Clusters and Dipole Coupled Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations