2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2011.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann model for compressible fluids

Abstract: We present an energy-conserving multiple-relaxation-time finite difference lattice Boltzmann model for compressible flows. This model is based on a 16-discrete-velocity model. The collision step is first calculated in the moment space and then mapped back to the velocity space. The moment space and corresponding transformation matrix are constructed according to the group representation theory. Equilibria of the nonconserved moments are chosen according to the need of recovering compressible Navier-Stokes equa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5(a) and (d), which is also accompanied by a small increase in the bulk velocity. The latter has been observed by other kinetic approaches and was linked to the particle mean free path [81,89,90]. Fluctuations are present in all quantities but are expected to decrease for larger N .…”
Section: B Sod Testsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…5(a) and (d), which is also accompanied by a small increase in the bulk velocity. The latter has been observed by other kinetic approaches and was linked to the particle mean free path [81,89,90]. Fluctuations are present in all quantities but are expected to decrease for larger N .…”
Section: B Sod Testsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In fact, given the great importance of high speed compressible flows in the aforementioned fields, constructing LB models for this area has been attempted since the early days of LB research, which yields the following five approaches, i.e., the adaptive approach by Sun et al [10], the circular function approach by Qu, et al [11], the doubledistribution-function (DDF) approach by Li, et al [12], the additional viscosity single-relaxation-time (AD SRT) approach [13,14] and the multiple-relaxation-time (MRT) approach [15,16] by our group. In the adaptive approach, particle velocities can vary with the Mach number and internal energy, and the Maxwellian distribution function (MDF) is replaced by the Kronecker function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the SRT approach [9,13,14,17] where f eq is conveniently expanded in terms of macroscopic quantities by only keeping the first relevant orders, this way is more simple and convenient, since it needs not to solve the complex kinetic moments to give the specific formulations of f eq . Compared to the MRT approach [15,16], the physical modeling process is more natural and straightforward, since the constructions of the transformation matrix and corresponding distribution function in the kinetic moment space are direct. Furthermore, this scheme has better generalization, since it works for all the one-, two-and three-dimensional model constructions and the choosing of DVM has a high degree of flexibility which results in higher efficiency and better stability of this approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme does not change the framework of the original LB model. The second is to develop Multiple Relaxation Time(MRT) LB models [41][42][43][44][45]. The framework is changed in the second scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%