2004
DOI: 10.1191/1352458504ms1078oa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): relation to established measures of impairment and disability

Abstract: Our study supports the use of the MSIS-29 as a measure for the assessment of physical impact of MS on normal daily life. In addition, our data provides a deeper understanding of the factors that determine both physical and psychological disease impact. Discrepancies between the latter two aspects deserve further attention.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
4
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
50
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to being internally consistent and reproducible, this scale has been shown to correspond to several well established generic health impact scales [14] and clinician assessed disability. [15][16][17] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition to being internally consistent and reproducible, this scale has been shown to correspond to several well established generic health impact scales [14] and clinician assessed disability. [15][16][17] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It consists of 29 questions, among which 20 address the physical impact component, and nine assess the psychological impact. A score is thus generated and reported on a scale from 0 to 100, on which lower scores indicate better quality of life [16][17][18] . The Timed 25-foot Walk (T25FW) was carried out on an area painted with a white strip, measuring 7.62 meters (25 feet), in a corridor at CATEM with an anti-slip floor surface.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the American Committee considers the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Measure (MSFC) to be a standard test because it evaluates the motor performance of the upper limbs (UL) and LL, along with cognition 15,16 , there are points that are not fully covered by this form of assessment, when gait is considered. A more complex test such as SSST may increase the sensitivity of this evaluation, but before it is fully used in Brazil, it needs to be validated.…”
Section: Reliability Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the EDSS is the most widely used scale for MS evaluation 15 , and is considered to be the gold standard, its application is limited only to doctors, since there is an evaluation of several functional systems. The authors agree with Nieuwenhuis et al, 2006 5 who said that this is not a linear scale, and its psychometric properties are not reliable, since it is not entirely objective and incorporates some subjective variables.…”
Section: Reliability Testmentioning
confidence: 99%