2019
DOI: 10.1101/750497
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple separate cases of pseudogenized meiosis genes Msh4 and Msh5 in Eurotiomycete fungi: associations with Zip3 sequence evolution and homothallism, but not Pch2 losses

Abstract: The overall process of meiosis is conserved in many species, including some lineages that have lost various ancestrally present meiosis genes. The extent to which individual meiosis gene losses are independent from or dependent on one another is largely unknown. Various Eurotiomycete fungi were investigated as a case system of recent meiosis gene losses after BLAST and synteny comparisons found Msh4, Msh5, Pch2, and Zip3 to be either pseudogenized or undetected in Aspergillus nidulans yet intact in congeners s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 89 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If confirmed, such scenario may be analogous to the loss of Msh4 and Msh5 in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, along with class I crossover formation and crossover interference losses (Hollingsworth and Brill 2004;Malik et al 2007), or parallel the loss of class I crossovers via loss-of-function mutations in Msh4 and/or Msh5 in model species as diverse as S. cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Arabidopsis thaliana, where such events result in fewer crossovers, and those that remain are interference-independent (i.e., produced by a pathway involving instead the Mus81-Mms4/Eme1 protein complex) (Zalevsky et al 1999;Kelly et al 2000;Higgins et al 2004;Hollingsworth and Brill 2004). While in C. depauperatus the effects of Msh4 and Msh5 losses are presently elusive, a recent comparative study in several Aspergillus species suggest an association between the absence of crossover interferencerelated genes and changes in chromosome number and size, with species lacking those genes having in general fewer and more uniform chromosome sizes (Savelkoul 2013;Savelkoul et al 2019) -a trend we interestingly observe between C. depauperatus (with 8 chromosomes) and other Cryptococcus species (with 14 chromosomes) that merits analysis in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If confirmed, such scenario may be analogous to the loss of Msh4 and Msh5 in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, along with class I crossover formation and crossover interference losses (Hollingsworth and Brill 2004;Malik et al 2007), or parallel the loss of class I crossovers via loss-of-function mutations in Msh4 and/or Msh5 in model species as diverse as S. cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Arabidopsis thaliana, where such events result in fewer crossovers, and those that remain are interference-independent (i.e., produced by a pathway involving instead the Mus81-Mms4/Eme1 protein complex) (Zalevsky et al 1999;Kelly et al 2000;Higgins et al 2004;Hollingsworth and Brill 2004). While in C. depauperatus the effects of Msh4 and Msh5 losses are presently elusive, a recent comparative study in several Aspergillus species suggest an association between the absence of crossover interferencerelated genes and changes in chromosome number and size, with species lacking those genes having in general fewer and more uniform chromosome sizes (Savelkoul 2013;Savelkoul et al 2019) -a trend we interestingly observe between C. depauperatus (with 8 chromosomes) and other Cryptococcus species (with 14 chromosomes) that merits analysis in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%