1993
DOI: 10.1002/qua.560480105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple solutions of the valence‐universal coupled‐cluster equations for Be, B+, and C2+

Abstract: Sets of nonlinear equations for the cluster amplitudes of the valence-universal coupled-cluster (VU-CC) method have been solved to obtain physically meaningful multiple solutions for Be, B', and Cz+. The wave operator is taken in Lindgren's normal ordered exponential form and the completeness of the model space is postulated. The cluster operator is restricted to its one-and two-electron components that are represented in terms of radial amplitudes defined by the configurational excitations (VU-CCSD/R method).… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the multiplicity at a given valence rank level will propagate into the higher levels (cf. [95,228,268] where T ( j ) now designates a connected-cluster operator* associated with the reference I@j ) E Mo. Thus, as in the SR case, we express each T ( j ) in terms of the excitation operators and corresponding amplitudes; that is, (2.129) where the superscript indicates the excitation level relative to i @ j ) , while the subscript enumerates distinct excitation operators or the corresponding configurations I @$)) = GY) 0') l @ j ) .…”
Section: Proper M R Cc Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the multiplicity at a given valence rank level will propagate into the higher levels (cf. [95,228,268] where T ( j ) now designates a connected-cluster operator* associated with the reference I@j ) E Mo. Thus, as in the SR case, we express each T ( j ) in terms of the excitation operators and corresponding amplitudes; that is, (2.129) where the superscript indicates the excitation level relative to i @ j ) , while the subscript enumerates distinct excitation operators or the corresponding configurations I @$)) = GY) 0') l @ j ) .…”
Section: Proper M R Cc Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective Hamiltonian formalism underlying both MR‐CC formulations requires description of several states at a time and that restricts applicability of the methods to relatively small and simple systems. Moreover, it has been found that one can face such problems like the intruder state problem 38 or multiplicity of the solutions 34, 39 in their numerical applications. In spite of the significant progress that has been made 40–47, obtaining a MR‐CC scheme that is simple, dependable and resistant to intruder states is still one of the most challenging problems of the computational quantum chemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work, started in the late 1970s by Rehmus, Kellman, Roothaan and Berry, 5,6 provides a generalization of other quantitative descriptions of electron correlation. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] At this point, reference must be made to the important progress in studying the correlation effects in atoms and molecules that followed from the two-particle densitymatrix approach, 17 d-dimensional theory, 18-20 the coupledcluster method, [21][22][23] and the density-functional approach. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work, started in the late 1970s by Rehmus, Kellman, Roothaan and Berry, 5,6 provides a generalization of other quantitative descriptions of electron correlation. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] At this point, reference must be made to the important progress in studying the correlation effects in atoms and molecules that followed from the two-particle densitymatrix approach, 17 d-dimensional theory, 18-20 the coupledcluster method, [21][22][23] and the density-functional approach. [24][25][26] For a system of more particles, we have yet to find a comparably powerful approach because so much information is contained in the wave function and we do not know how to extract what is relevant in a manner adaptable to pictures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%