2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple stressors, state-dependence and predation risk — foraging trade-offs: toward a modern concept of trait-mediated indirect effects in communities and ecosystems

Abstract: Trait-mediated indirect effects driven by organismal foraging-predation risk trade-offs can determine food web structure and ecosystem functioning. How this trade-off is shaped by organismal state in relation to multiple environmental stressors remains poorly understood. Attention to this issue is fundamentally important in an era of global change where multiple stressors increasingly present unique challenges for populations of organisms. The challenges are compounded by geographic patterns in adaptation that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
55
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
55
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, Leucauge and Cyclosa are both orb‐weaver spiders and they also displayed distict responses in their host and transplanted environments suggesting differences in their thermal sensitivities. Although it was beyond the scope of this study, thermal sensitivity differences between predators and prey can potentially alter trophic interactions to a larger degree (Lemoine, 2017; Schmitz & Trussell, 2016). Our complementary laboratory and field experiments only tested the effects of changing temperatures and prey macronutrient content on predator feeding responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Leucauge and Cyclosa are both orb‐weaver spiders and they also displayed distict responses in their host and transplanted environments suggesting differences in their thermal sensitivities. Although it was beyond the scope of this study, thermal sensitivity differences between predators and prey can potentially alter trophic interactions to a larger degree (Lemoine, 2017; Schmitz & Trussell, 2016). Our complementary laboratory and field experiments only tested the effects of changing temperatures and prey macronutrient content on predator feeding responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enhanced flexibility, however, should increase the expression of both beneficial and costly traits among prey when they are exposed to predators. Of course, prey must balance the need to respond to predators with other selective forces (e.g., the abiotic stressor itself, Schmitz and Trussell ), thereby constraining their ability to express phenotypes that maximize survival against predators alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of predation risk on prey metabolism, and, in turn, on ecosystems, is context and state dependent (Matassa et al. , Schmitz and Trussell ). Research into the eco‐physiological effects of predators has produced results showing both predator‐induced increases and decreases in prey growth efficiency and nutrient waste production (McPeek et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%