2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-022-10283-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Treatment Modeling for Target Marketing Campaigns: A Large-Scale Benchmark Study

Abstract: Machine learning and artificial intelligence (ML/AI) promise higher degrees of personalization and enhanced efficiency in marketing communication. The paper focuses on causal ML/AI models for campaign targeting. Such models estimate the change in customer behavior due to a marketing action known as the individual treatment effect (ITE) or uplift. ITE estimates capture the value of a marketing action when applied to a specific customer and facilitate effective and efficient targeting. We consolidate uplift mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In "Multiple Treatment Modeling for Target Marketing Campaigns: A Large-Scale Benchmark Study", Gubela et al (2024) focus on causal ML/AI models for campaign targeting. More specifically, the authors introduce multiple treatment revenue uplift modelling to improve decision-making in target marketing campaigns in an attempt to answer the research question of whether multiple treatment models for continuous outcomes realise more campaign return on marketing than multiple treatment models for binary outcomes and single treatment models.…”
Section: Papers In This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In "Multiple Treatment Modeling for Target Marketing Campaigns: A Large-Scale Benchmark Study", Gubela et al (2024) focus on causal ML/AI models for campaign targeting. More specifically, the authors introduce multiple treatment revenue uplift modelling to improve decision-making in target marketing campaigns in an attempt to answer the research question of whether multiple treatment models for continuous outcomes realise more campaign return on marketing than multiple treatment models for binary outcomes and single treatment models.…”
Section: Papers In This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%