2010
DOI: 10.1049/iet-spr.2009.0084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-view time–frequency distribution based on the empirical mode decomposition

Abstract: Original citationStevenson It was also shown to have performance comparable to the WVD when estimating the instantaneous frequency (IF) of multiple signal components in the presence of noise.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presented results indicate that the MBD, being an example of Separable kernel TFDs, is a good choice of a TFD when the proposed method is applied in practical situations [4]. These results show that the proposed algorithm can be useful in many applications that require component count and component separation; and, it can be a preferred alternative to other methods such as the Empirical Mode Decomposition [15]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The presented results indicate that the MBD, being an example of Separable kernel TFDs, is a good choice of a TFD when the proposed method is applied in practical situations [4]. These results show that the proposed algorithm can be useful in many applications that require component count and component separation; and, it can be a preferred alternative to other methods such as the Empirical Mode Decomposition [15]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The Johansen test is a procedure for testing the cointegrating relationships of several integrated processes of order zero or one [44]. Since the test evaluates more than one cointegrating relationship within the time series, it is applicable for multivariate signals such as multi-channel EEG.…”
Section: Appendix a Empirical Mode Decomposition (Emd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique is an adaptive method which breaks down a nonstationary and nonlinear signal into its intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) [43]. Each IMF is a monocomponent signal which generates no interference in a QTFD [44]. In other words, the IMFs represent simple oscillatory modes with time-varying amplitude and frequency:…”
Section: Monocomponent Signals Vs Multicomponent Signals: Necessity mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is superior to the traditional methods based on fast Fourier transform (FFT) in terms of non-stationary signals and has achieved successful application in a variety of areas as fault diagnosis, information detection, biomedical industry and etc. [2][3][4]. WP analysis can solve the contradiction between time and frequency resolution well and provides an ever finer way of non-stationary signal analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%