2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-015-0130-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplex Immunogold Chromatographic Assay for Simultaneous Determination of Macrolide Antibiotics in Raw Milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LOD of the ELISA with 0.3 μg/L was lower than that of the developed FPIA with 14.08 μg/L using the same mAb 5B2 in milk [ 28 ]; however, the homogeneous FPIA demands a much shorter time of about 5 min for the detection of ERY in milk, which is urgently required for rapid screening methods. Table S3 shows the LOD and assay time of the developed FPIA compared with typical instrumental analytical methods and immunoassays [ 1 , 12 , 13 , 28 , 36 , 37 , 38 ], demonstrating that the newly established FPIA had the shortest detecting time for ERY under a satisfactory LOD, which confirmed the suitability of this assay for the rapid, accurate, and precise determination of ERY in real samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LOD of the ELISA with 0.3 μg/L was lower than that of the developed FPIA with 14.08 μg/L using the same mAb 5B2 in milk [ 28 ]; however, the homogeneous FPIA demands a much shorter time of about 5 min for the detection of ERY in milk, which is urgently required for rapid screening methods. Table S3 shows the LOD and assay time of the developed FPIA compared with typical instrumental analytical methods and immunoassays [ 1 , 12 , 13 , 28 , 36 , 37 , 38 ], demonstrating that the newly established FPIA had the shortest detecting time for ERY under a satisfactory LOD, which confirmed the suitability of this assay for the rapid, accurate, and precise determination of ERY in real samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The following supporting information can be downloaded at: , Figure S1: The TLC purification of tracers; Figure S2: Mass spectra of ERY-CMO-4′-AMF(A), ERM-FITC (B), and ERM-SRSC (C); Figure S3: Binding curves for three antibodies with the ERY-CMO-4′-AMF (A), ERM-FITC (B), ERM-AF647 (C), and ERM- SRSC (D); Figure S4: Standard curves for three antibodies with ERY-CMO-4′-AMF (A), ERM-FITC (B), ERM-SRSC (C), and ERM-AF647 (D); Table S1: The IC 50 values and CRs of FPIA; Table S2: The parameters of standard curves in BB, BB with skimmed milk powder, and milk matrix; Table S3: Summary of typically reported immunoassays for the determination of ERY. References [ 1 , 12 , 13 , 28 , 36 , 37 , 38 ] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CGNPs were prepared as described previously with some modifications. 18 Briefly, 100 mL of ultrapure water was heated to boiling under stirring. Then, 1.0 mL of 1% chloroauric acid solution (w/v) was added.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CGNPs were prepared as described previously with some modi cations (Li et al 2015). Brie y, 100 mL of ultrapure water was heated to boiling under stirring.…”
Section: Preparation Of Cgnpsmentioning
confidence: 99%