2019
DOI: 10.1111/jfd.13068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplex PCR for genotypingFlavobacterium columnare

Abstract: Recent research has identified four distinct genetic groups among isolates of Flavobacterium columnare through multilocus phylogenetic analyses; however, there are no quick methods to determine the genotype of an isolate. The objective of this research was to develop a multiplex PCR to rapidly genotype F. columnare to genetic group. Comparative bacterial genomics was used to identify regions in the genomes unique to each genetic group, and primers were designed to specifically amplify different sized amplicons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Presumptive F. covae recovered from dead fish were confirmed by multiplex PCR as described by [ 7 , 37 ]. Each 25 μL reaction contained a 12.5 µL 2× hot-start PCR-to-gel-master mix (Amresco LLC, Solon, OH, USA), 2 µL of the primer cocktail (0.5 µM GG-forward, 0.1 µM GG1-reverse, 0.45 µM GG2-reverse, 0.45 µM GG3-reverse, 0.3 µM GG4-reverse), 9.5 µL of nuclease-free water, and 1.0 µL of template DNA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presumptive F. covae recovered from dead fish were confirmed by multiplex PCR as described by [ 7 , 37 ]. Each 25 μL reaction contained a 12.5 µL 2× hot-start PCR-to-gel-master mix (Amresco LLC, Solon, OH, USA), 2 µL of the primer cocktail (0.5 µM GG-forward, 0.1 µM GG1-reverse, 0.45 µM GG2-reverse, 0.45 µM GG3-reverse, 0.3 µM GG4-reverse), 9.5 µL of nuclease-free water, and 1.0 µL of template DNA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: C. aahli ( n = 1; Loch and Faisal 2014b), C. aquaticum ( n = 1; Kim et al 2008), and C. scophthalmum ( n = 1; VanDamme et al 1994). The remaining 30 isolates were newly identified as flavobacteria or F. columnare using previously published protocols (Loch et al 2013; LaFrentz et al 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, gDNA (20 ng) from isolate 2K was used as template in the multiplex PCR, an appropriate positive control (consisting of a mixture of 10 ng gDNA each of F. columnare ATCC 23463 T , F. covae AL-02-36 T , F. davisii 90-106 T , and F. oreochromis Costa Rica 04-02-TN T ), and a no template negative control was included. PCR was performed as described by LaFrentz, García, and Shelley (2019). Following PCR, amplified products were resolved with 1.5% agarose gel electrophoreses and the size of the product was used for identification, with F. columnare, F. covae, F. davisii, and F. oreochromis yielding products with size of 415, 320, 894, and 659 bp, respectively.…”
Section: Identification Of Yellow-pigmented Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%