2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2022.114615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplex real-time PCR for the detection and differentiation of equid gammaherpesvirus 2 and 5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the NSP3 target showed this lower sensitivity in the ERVA/ERVB VP6 quadruplex assay compared to the triplex assay previously developed, the G3 and G14 VP7 targets had comparable sensitivity. Reduced sensitivity of multiplex RT-qPCR or qPCR assays compared to singleplex counterparts is not unusual and has been previously reported [69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77]. Based on previous studies, the reduction in sensitivity compared to singleplex assays is typically slight and could be due to differential amplification of one target over others (based on the amplification efficiencies), target abundance, reagent competition, and non-specific interactions between primer sets or a combination of these [70][71][72]74].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Although the NSP3 target showed this lower sensitivity in the ERVA/ERVB VP6 quadruplex assay compared to the triplex assay previously developed, the G3 and G14 VP7 targets had comparable sensitivity. Reduced sensitivity of multiplex RT-qPCR or qPCR assays compared to singleplex counterparts is not unusual and has been previously reported [69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77]. Based on previous studies, the reduction in sensitivity compared to singleplex assays is typically slight and could be due to differential amplification of one target over others (based on the amplification efficiencies), target abundance, reagent competition, and non-specific interactions between primer sets or a combination of these [70][71][72]74].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%