2020
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.579762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplexed Droplet Digital PCR Assays for the Simultaneous Screening of Major Genetic Alterations in Tumors of the Central Nervous System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the increased cost, longer turnaround time, requirement for moderate, or even high amount of biological material, these techniques offer the benefit of delineating the complex genomic and epigenomic landscape of tumors, which may provide prognostic as well as therapeutic information. A more detailed discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each technique have been highlighted previously (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the increased cost, longer turnaround time, requirement for moderate, or even high amount of biological material, these techniques offer the benefit of delineating the complex genomic and epigenomic landscape of tumors, which may provide prognostic as well as therapeutic information. A more detailed discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each technique have been highlighted previously (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have successfully used this technique for the detection of recurrent genome copy number variations (CNV) including duplications in CNS tumors, using, in the same DNA test sample, a standard dPCR design with two different colored probes directed against a target sequence and a reference sequence (invariable on the same chromosome, same arm or another chromosome or SNP) (18)(19)(20). However, the duplicated region of the BCOR-ITD is very small, hindering its segregation into different droplets and its CNV evaluation by standard designs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BRAF V600E mutation, BRAF exon 14 duplication, FGFR1 N546K/ K656E mutations and FGFR1 tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) duplication were assessed for every patient by previously described multiplexed digital PCR (mdPCR) assays [27][28][29]. Fractional abundance and copy number variation (CNV) were calculated with the cut-off values and detection thresholds defined by Appay et al [29].…”
Section: Multiplexed Droplet Digital Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FGFR1 clone selection for rare resistant has been also reported in lung and colorectal resistant tumors, thus revealing a change in variant allele frequency of FGFR1 somatic variants 55;56 . Of note, N546K mutation was also found in Ewing sarcoma and brain tumors [27][28][29][30][31] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in addition to the already reported single relapsed NB case 15 , N546K mutation has also been recently reported in 6 patients 25 . Speci cally, N546K represents an activating mutation that alters FGFR1 auto-phosphorylation 26 , resulting in an increase of kinase activity and malignant transformation in Ewing sarcoma and brain tumors [27][28][29][30][31] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%