2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41596-018-0120-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplexed profiling of RNA and protein expression signatures in individual cells using flow or mass cytometry

Abstract: Advances in single-cell analysis technologies are providing novel insights into phenotypic and functional heterogeneity within seemingly identical cell populations. RNA within single cells can be analyzed using unbiased sequencing protocols or through more targeted approaches using in situ hybridization (ISH). The proximity ligation assay for RNA (PLAYR) approach is a sensitive and high-throughput technique that relies on in situ and proximal ligation to measure at least 27 specific RNAs by flow or mass cytome… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assay relies on sequential antibody-based cell surface labelling, thereby preserving cell integrity and minimizing cell loss 34,35 . These features, along with the ability to isolate viable and functional low frequency cytokine-defined cells, encapsulate the main competitive advantage of this assay over traditional intracellular cytokine-staining or flow fluorescent in situ hybridization [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . Assay multiplexing is attractive for maximizing the output of potentially limited clinical sample volumes, and has been previously used with CSA to both isolate and distinguish distinct cytokine-secreting immune cells 42,43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The assay relies on sequential antibody-based cell surface labelling, thereby preserving cell integrity and minimizing cell loss 34,35 . These features, along with the ability to isolate viable and functional low frequency cytokine-defined cells, encapsulate the main competitive advantage of this assay over traditional intracellular cytokine-staining or flow fluorescent in situ hybridization [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . Assay multiplexing is attractive for maximizing the output of potentially limited clinical sample volumes, and has been previously used with CSA to both isolate and distinguish distinct cytokine-secreting immune cells 42,43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…impact of such cells on responses of other cells in vitro, or when introduced in vivo (potentially in the form of adoptive cell transfer 18 ). However, the isolation of viable and purified cytokine-expressing immune cells has presented a technical challenge, as commonly used intracellular cytokine-staining (ICS) or flow-fluorescent in-situ hybridization approaches involve cell fixation and permeabilization [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . The resultant loss of cell viability and integrity seriously limits the use of cells for comprehensive functional profiling and downstream applications [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FMO) control to accurately define background and signal to noise ratio for targets of interest. We consider multiparameter flow cytometry, as well as mass cytometry [32, 33], two increasingly useful technologies to afford new insight into heterogeneity of virus infection and gene expression that provide a complementary approach to other single cell technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of HIV-1 + cells is typically achieved by the detection of viral RNA (vRNA), viral DNA (vDNA) or expression of the structural protein p24. Several direct single-cell virus detection imaging methods with signal amplification were developed in the past years, including in situ PCR (Bagasra et al, 1993), tyramide amplification (Soontornniyomkij et al, 1999), and the tunable rolling circle amplification (Frei et al, 2016;Duckworth et al, 2019). All these methods relied on sensitive RNA or DNA fluorescence detection through signal amplification, but at the cost of low reproducibility and high false detection rate due to high background.…”
Section: Single-cell Detection Of Rare Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%