2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplexing Stimulus Information through Rate and Temporal Codes in Primate Somatosensory Cortex

Abstract: In somatosensory cortex, stimulus amplitude is represented at a relatively coarse temporal resolution, while stimulus frequency is represented by precisely timed action potentials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
196
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
196
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the somatosensory system was found to simultaneously rely on both spike rates and timing (Harvey et al, 2013;Saal and Bensmaia, 2014). Mechanoreceptors of the primate glabrous skin and their downstream cortical targets seem to represent spatiotemporal features of tactile stimuli using temporal response properties (Johansson and Birznieks, 2004;Mackevicius et al, 2012;Harvey et al, 2013;Weber et al, 2013), whereas stimulus intensity is represented by a rate code (Bensmaia, 2008;Harvey et al, 2013). In good accordance with these results, we found evidence that the leech mechanosensory system also uses both types of encoding simultaneously.…”
Section: Rate Coding Versus Temporal Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the somatosensory system was found to simultaneously rely on both spike rates and timing (Harvey et al, 2013;Saal and Bensmaia, 2014). Mechanoreceptors of the primate glabrous skin and their downstream cortical targets seem to represent spatiotemporal features of tactile stimuli using temporal response properties (Johansson and Birznieks, 2004;Mackevicius et al, 2012;Harvey et al, 2013;Weber et al, 2013), whereas stimulus intensity is represented by a rate code (Bensmaia, 2008;Harvey et al, 2013). In good accordance with these results, we found evidence that the leech mechanosensory system also uses both types of encoding simultaneously.…”
Section: Rate Coding Versus Temporal Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, there is good evidence to show that temporal coding of other qualities, including orientation of edges (Pruszynski and Johansson 2014) and vibration frequency (Harvey et al 2013), contributes to encoding tactile inputs. For the types of surfaces studied here, we do not believe that a temporal code contributes to the central representation of the intensity of tactile roughness.…”
Section: Coding Of Tactile Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given their high sensitivity and large receptive fields, PC afferents are likely to play a central role in conveying this cue (Srinivasan et al 1990;Vallbo and Johansson 1984), although SA and RA afferents could contribute as well (Johansson et al 1982;Talbot et al 1968). According to recent studies (Dépeault et al 2013, Harvey et al 2013, the integration of multiple tactile cues could occur in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1). Neurons of S1 were found to be sensitive to moving tactile stimuli of the types used in the present study (Dépeault et al 2013).…”
Section: Vibrations As a Cue To Tactile Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurons of S1 were found to be sensitive to moving tactile stimuli of the types used in the present study (Dépeault et al 2013). Moreover, they encoded vibration amplitude in the strength of their response and responded to a wide range of vibration frequencies, suggesting they receive input from PC and other afferents (Harvey et al 2013). …”
Section: Vibrations As a Cue To Tactile Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%