2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10851-018-00870-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplicative Noise Removal Based on the Smooth Diffusion Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The two-dimensional discretisation of the procedure is presented in Appendix B. This scheme has been adopted due to its simplicity, though it should be noted that alternative and more computationally efficient approaches have been developed, based on operator splitting or factored schemes [15,40,32] The behaviour of the anisotropic diffusion equation can be observed with simple tests. Here we take as examples two 1D functions: i) a smooth trigonometric function f (x) = sin(x) + cos(3x), and ii) a series of incremental step functions.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Perona-malik Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-dimensional discretisation of the procedure is presented in Appendix B. This scheme has been adopted due to its simplicity, though it should be noted that alternative and more computationally efficient approaches have been developed, based on operator splitting or factored schemes [15,40,32] The behaviour of the anisotropic diffusion equation can be observed with simple tests. Here we take as examples two 1D functions: i) a smooth trigonometric function f (x) = sin(x) + cos(3x), and ii) a series of incremental step functions.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Perona-malik Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are adaptive filters such as filters based on MAP estimator [2,3] and nonlocal means filter [6].Wavelet method or wavelet MAP combined method are reported in the despeckling problems [7]. Anisotropic diffusion methods [8,9] and nonlinear diffusion equation based method [4,5] are also proposed for speckle reduction. Unlike additive Gaussian noise, speckle noise is much more difficult to be removed from the corrupted images, mainly because of not only their multiplicative nature, but also their statistical characteristic [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], a convex variational model based on generalized Kullback-Leibler distance was proposed to remove the speckles in ultrasound images. For the multiplicative Gamma noise removal, a nonlinear diffusion equation with smooth solution was proposed in [14]. Methods based on total variation (TV), which have outstanding performance in the removal of additive Gaussian noise and the preservation of edges, such as Rudin-Osher-Fatami (ROF) model [15], have been introduced in the literature of speckle reduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the rapid development of sensors in the last few years has brought us new opportunities, resulting in the birth of optical-driven non-local SAR speckle removal technology. Secondly, the popularity of PDE-based methods [42,32,31] relies on nonlinear diffusion techniques. The second order equation usually has the extremum principle to ensure the stability and smoothness of the restoration results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second order equation usually has the extremum principle to ensure the stability and smoothness of the restoration results. In particular, a nonlinear diffusion equation with smooth solution is proposed in [31]. The fourth order equation can improve the staircase effect, but the equation theory is difficult to carry out.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%