2010
DOI: 10.1007/bf03191222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplicities and Rees valuations

Abstract: Abstract. Let (R, m) be a local ring of Krull dimension d and I ⊆ R be an ideal with analytic spread d. We show that the j-multiplicity of I is determined by the Rees valuations of I centered on m. We also discuss a multiplicity that is the limsup of a sequence of lengths that grow at an O(n d ) rate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vanishing of the ε-multiplicity of an ideal is captured by the analytic spread of the ideal. Indeed, as in the case of j -multiplicity, the ε-multiplicity of I is not zero if and only if the analytic spread of I is maximal [23,41]. In particular, by Proposition 6.1 we obtain the following result.…”
Section: The ε -Multiplicity Of Edge Idealsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The vanishing of the ε-multiplicity of an ideal is captured by the analytic spread of the ideal. Indeed, as in the case of j -multiplicity, the ε-multiplicity of I is not zero if and only if the analytic spread of I is maximal [23,41]. In particular, by Proposition 6.1 we obtain the following result.…”
Section: The ε -Multiplicity Of Edge Idealsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Since the analytic spread of J is maximal we conclude from [20,Theorem 4.7] that the epsilon multiplicity ε R (J) = 0. This yields a contradiction.…”
Section: Multi-graded Hilbert Functionsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The following theorem may be compared with a nonvanishing result of Katz and Validashti [20,Theorem 4.7].…”
Section: Multi-graded Hilbert Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For related work in a more general setting the reader is referred to D. Katz and J. Validashti [8]. Proof.…”
Section: Degree Function Coefficients Of I (Not Necessarily Simple)mentioning
confidence: 99%