1973
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(73)90728-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplicity distributions in proton-nucleus collisions at 67 and 200 GeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data for oxygen and sulfur interactions have been compared with those obtained earlier from the analysis of 2595 proton-emulsion interactions [20,21] at the same primary energy of 200 GeV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These data for oxygen and sulfur interactions have been compared with those obtained earlier from the analysis of 2595 proton-emulsion interactions [20,21] at the same primary energy of 200 GeV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We have also included in this table the corresponding quantities for proton interactions [20,21]. In Fig.…”
Section: Fragmentation O F T H E Target Nucleusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…intermediate waves represent a major contribution to the fluctuations of the interplanetary plasma detected by spacecraft at 1 astronomical unit (A.U.). This identification is based on observations of the correlation between fluctuations in the magnetic field and plasma velocity, which are observed 5,6 to have a phase shift of 0 or 180°. Such a phase shift is consistent with propagating Alfv §n waves, but not consistent with evanescent waves, for which the phase shift would be ±90°.…”
Section: Rule (Ii) Then Reads T 0 /Y I -(V I^vi^t^mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the increase in D(n s ) is indicative of the extension in the dimensions of the source of the particle production. For the case of proton-nucleus interactions, the values of a and b calculated from the data reported earlier by Babecki et al [23] come out to be −0.648 and 0.697, respectively. The increase in D(n s ) with < n s > in the case of proton-proton (p-p) collisions [24] is slower than that for proton-emulsion (p-em) and nucleus-nucleus collisions.…”
Section: Multiplicity Distribution Of Shower Particlesmentioning
confidence: 89%