1996
DOI: 10.12775/tmna.1996.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplicity of nodal solutions for elliptic equations with supercritical exponent in contractible domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Except for results in domains involving symmetries or exponents close to critical, see for instance [7,8,10,14,16], solvability of (1.1)- (1.2) in the supercritical case has been a widely open matter, particularly since variational machinery no longer applies, at least in its naturally adapted way for subcritical or critical problems.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for results in domains involving symmetries or exponents close to critical, see for instance [7,8,10,14,16], solvability of (1.1)- (1.2) in the supercritical case has been a widely open matter, particularly since variational machinery no longer applies, at least in its naturally adapted way for subcritical or critical problems.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We finally obtain where I e was defined in (12). The definition of f yields that The easily checked facts that…”
Section: Super-critical Elliptic Problemsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…While it may be expected that this solution survives a small super-critical perturbation of the exponent as in (1), the indirect variational arguments employed in [2,6] do not seem to give in principle a clue on how to obtain this fact. Solvability when q > N þ2 N À2 in domains ''with topology'' is not true, in general, as shown via counterexamples by Passaseo [11,12], answering negatively the question stated by Brezis [4]. In our recent work [7], we have considered problem (1) in Coron's situation of a domain with a small perforation, and proved solvability whenever e is sufficiently small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In [16,17] Passaseo constructs examples that show that the answer is in general negative. Among other results, he finds that for N ≥ 4 there is a topologically nontrivial domain, for which no solution of (1.2) exists if q > N +1 N −3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%