2013
DOI: 10.1111/pace.12180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multipole Analysis of Heart Rate Variability as a Predictor of Imminent Ventricular Arrhythmias in ICD Patients

Abstract: The multipole method of HRV analysis emerges as a highly specific, possible predictor of imminent VTA, providing an early warning allowing to prepare for an arrhythmic episode.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With 5 minutes of HRV signal length prior to VTA onset, our method achieves 79.41% of accuracy, which is higher than the accuracy reported by Joo, et al, [11] (best previous work) and Wollman, et al, [14] respectively. Although the accuracy levels were not reported by Thong & Raitt [12] and Rozen, et al, [13], their prediction sensitivity and specificity were not balanced with low sensitivity rate (53 and 50%). It shows that their prediction methods achieved poor performance in predicting the VTA onset successfully.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…With 5 minutes of HRV signal length prior to VTA onset, our method achieves 79.41% of accuracy, which is higher than the accuracy reported by Joo, et al, [11] (best previous work) and Wollman, et al, [14] respectively. Although the accuracy levels were not reported by Thong & Raitt [12] and Rozen, et al, [13], their prediction sensitivity and specificity were not balanced with low sensitivity rate (53 and 50%). It shows that their prediction methods achieved poor performance in predicting the VTA onset successfully.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…With the additional types of HRV features and GA based optimization process, prediction performance of our method outperforms all previous works with 77.94%, 80.88% and 79.41 % for sensitivity, specificity and accuracy respectively even though we use stricter approach to evaluate our method. Prediction sensitivity and specificity of our method are more balanced when compared to previous works [12][13][14]. Furthermore, in contrast to most of previous works [12][13][14] that used more than 10 minutes of HRV signal, our method only uses 5 minutes HRV signal, which end immediately prior to VTA onset, for feature extraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations