1973
DOI: 10.1002/qua.560070412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multipole structure of exchange polarization energy for H2+ Ion

Abstract: AbstractsThe exchange polarization energy for the H$ ion is expressed as an infinite sum of its angular components. At large internuclear distances R, a particular 1-component, referred to as induced 2l-pole exchange enerD, behaves asymptoticaUy like For larger R this suggests a rather slow 1-4 rate of convergence of the series. However, as contrasted to the analogous expansion for the induction energy the convergence speeds u p considerably with decreasing internuclear separation.Die Austauschpolarisierungsen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional calculations of the componnets E00exch_disp , E01exch_disp, and E02each_disp showed, however, that these quantities were negligible, representing less than 1 per cent of Eexoh_disp. A very similar observation concerning the importance of Edisp ~176 Edisp ~ and Edisp ~ has been made by Kreek and Meath [15].…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussion Klsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additional calculations of the componnets E00exch_disp , E01exch_disp, and E02each_disp showed, however, that these quantities were negligible, representing less than 1 per cent of Eexoh_disp. A very similar observation concerning the importance of Edisp ~176 Edisp ~ and Edisp ~ has been made by Kreek and Meath [15].…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussion Klsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…We found that at the van der Waals minimum, R--8-0 bohr, Eexch_disp 11= 0"0924 K what represents only 18-6 per cent of the exchange polarization energy for this system [23]. It is worthwhile to stress that the observed behaviour of the exchange dispersion energy is in sharp contrast to behaviour of the exchange induction energy for which the multipole expansion was shown to converge quite satisfactorily [15].…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussion Klmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the H2+ ion the exchange induction term efficiently approximated second-and higher-order exchange effects. 98 Later, however, it was found that the sum of the induction and exchange induction contributions failed to reproduce the mutual deformation effect arising at the SCF level between closed-shell atoms. 56,96,99,100 This fact was attributed to the weak symmetry forcing applied in the exchange polarization term.101,102 It turned out that exchange effects are crucial in the mutual deformation of closed-shell atoms and ions.102,103 These effects can be accounted for only by an exchange perturbation formalism with strong symmetry forcing.101 (Strong symmetry forcing, as opposed to weak symmetry forcing, considers symmetry constraints and electrostatic effects simultaneously.12) It is still not clear whether the exchange dispersion term suffers from the same problem.…”
Section: Problems With the Exchange Induction Termmentioning
confidence: 99%