2004
DOI: 10.17487/rfc3812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE) Management Information Base (MIB)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This document uses terminology from the Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture [RFC3031], the MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE) MIB [RFC3812], the MPLS Label Switching Router (LSR) MIB [RFC3813], the OAM Framework for MPLS-Based Transport Networks [RFC6371], "MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Identifiers" [RFC6370], MPLS-TP Identifiers Following ITU-T Conventions [RFC6923], and OAM in MPLS Transport Networks [RFC5860]. The MPLS transport profile OAM identifiers MIB module is designed to satisfy the following requirements and constraints:…”
Section: Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This document uses terminology from the Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture [RFC3031], the MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE) MIB [RFC3812], the MPLS Label Switching Router (LSR) MIB [RFC3813], the OAM Framework for MPLS-Based Transport Networks [RFC6371], "MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Identifiers" [RFC6370], MPLS-TP Identifiers Following ITU-T Conventions [RFC6923], and OAM in MPLS Transport Networks [RFC5860]. The MPLS transport profile OAM identifiers MIB module is designed to satisfy the following requirements and constraints:…”
Section: Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of this writing, SNMP SET is no longer recommended as a way to configure MPLS networks as was described in [RFC3812]. However, since the MIB modules specified in this document are intended to work in parallel with the MIB modules for MPLS specified in [RFC3812], certain objects defined here are specified with a MAX-ACCESS of read-write or read-create so that specifications of the base tables in [RFC3812] and the new MIB modules in this document are consistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, in Figure 5 the NMS supplies the head-end LSR with a fully computed explicit path for the TE LSP that it is to establish through signaling. The NMS uses a management plane mechanism to send this request and encodes the data using a representation such as the TE MIB module [RFC3812].…”
Section: Management-based Pce Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it describes managed objects for modeling Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) [RFC3945] based traffic engineering (TE). The tables and objects defined in this document extend those defined in the equivalent document for MPLS traffic engineering [RFC3812], and management of GMPLS traffic engineering is built on management of MPLS traffic engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%