2014
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2013.2271596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multirate Estimation and Control of Body Slip Angle for Electric Vehicles Based on Onboard Vision System

Abstract: A new method for vehicle body-slip-angle estimation using nontraditional sensor configuration and system model is proposed, which enables robust estimation against vehicle parameter uncertainties. In this approach, a linear vehicle bicycle model is augmented with a simple visual model. As the visual model contains few uncertain parameters and increases the observer's design freedom, the combined model-based estimator provides more accurate estimation result compared with the traditional bicycle-model-based one… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the analysis of the image processing step is limited to a measurement or estimate of the computational delay and is assumed to be negligible compared to other delays in the control loop [2][3] [20]. Control engineers tackle a long sample period of IBC systems using state estimation [12], robust design [13], predictive control [14], observer-based [1], multi-rate sampling [26] and reconfigurable pipelining methods [15]. However, these approaches do not model and consider platform constraints like resource availability and mapping, and/or workload variations in image processing [1].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the analysis of the image processing step is limited to a measurement or estimate of the computational delay and is assumed to be negligible compared to other delays in the control loop [2][3] [20]. Control engineers tackle a long sample period of IBC systems using state estimation [12], robust design [13], predictive control [14], observer-based [1], multi-rate sampling [26] and reconfigurable pipelining methods [15]. However, these approaches do not model and consider platform constraints like resource availability and mapping, and/or workload variations in image processing [1].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several studies related with vehicle sideslip angle estimations in the literature [178][179][180][181][182][183][184][185][186][187][188][189][192][193][194]. In [179], a nonlinear tire model based observer (NTMBO) is developed for estimating the vehicle body slip angle.…”
Section: Sideslip Angle and Roll Angle Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [178,184], an RLS based vehicle sideslip angle estimation algorithm is studied by using the real-time lateral tire force measurements obtained from the multisensing hub units. In [185], the vehicle body slip angle observer is designed based on the multirate Kalman filter (MKF) by using the combined vehicle and vision models. In [186], a comparison of four different observer methods to estimate the sideslip angle such as Linear Observer (LO), extended Kalman filter-based nonlinear observer (EKFNO), extended Luenberger observer (ELO) and SMO are presented.…”
Section: Sideslip Angle and Roll Angle Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10] It is commonly recognized that performance of the control systems heavily depends on 1 knowledge of vehicle states information, which characterizes longitudinal and lateral stability of vehicles, such as yaw rate, sideslip angle, and longitudinal velocity. [11][12][13][14][15] For DDEV, it is measurement of sideslip angle and longitudinal velocity that needed expensive and dedicated sensors directly. Therefore, for cost savings and practical application considerations, it is necessary to propose a soft measurement approach to estimate DDEV states with high precision based on commonly low-cost sensors of production vehicle such as accelerometer and steering angle sensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%