2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2018.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale analyses and characterizations of surface topographies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
109
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
1
109
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, topographic features of a given size are best discernible when observed at particular scales. This phenomenon is the principle of the third approach, i.e., multiscale methods [ 3 ]. The importance of scale lies in the characterizations of physical interactions between formation process and resulted surface topography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, topographic features of a given size are best discernible when observed at particular scales. This phenomenon is the principle of the third approach, i.e., multiscale methods [ 3 ]. The importance of scale lies in the characterizations of physical interactions between formation process and resulted surface topography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface topographies, appropriately characterized, can explain a variety of physical phenomena, like wear and diffusion [1,2]. ISO 25178, EUR 15178N and ASME B46.1 standardize calculations of topographic and roughness characterization parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One advantage of RTI is that the measuring apparatus can be used in more hostile environments than conventional topographic measurement instruments, which are most often designed for laboratory use. Issues that need to be addressed include scales for characterizations and analyses, as well as appropriate statistics for topographic heterogeneities [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We imagine an infinite ensemble of surfaces (possibly infinite themselves), usually corresponding formally to a random process, which may or may not be widesense stationary. Measurement of non-stationary fractal surfaces in an interval of scales in which they do exhibit self-affinity adds its own set of difficulties [9,18]. Here we will focus on roughness generated by stationary processes-and estimation of their parameters using a finite measurement of one realization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%