2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.11.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale CFD modelling and analysis of TBR behavior for an HDS process: Deviations from ideal behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, nowadays, the modeling of these systems requires simplifications, such as model order reduction, since the purely theoretical (mechanistic) models are still too computationally expensive, require an unpractical level of detail in the geometrical representation [29], or result in ill-posed or highly stiff equations [30]. In order to avoid such complexity, the common approach is to insert on the transport equations closure sub-models that capture, to a certain extent, complex phenomena, such as the microscale multiphase interactions [31]. The drawback in relying on coupled sub-model lays is the fact that these closure terms are usually a set of empirical or semi-empirical expressions, which lack a mechanistic development and can, hence, constrain the applicability of the main mathematical model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, nowadays, the modeling of these systems requires simplifications, such as model order reduction, since the purely theoretical (mechanistic) models are still too computationally expensive, require an unpractical level of detail in the geometrical representation [29], or result in ill-posed or highly stiff equations [30]. In order to avoid such complexity, the common approach is to insert on the transport equations closure sub-models that capture, to a certain extent, complex phenomena, such as the microscale multiphase interactions [31]. The drawback in relying on coupled sub-model lays is the fact that these closure terms are usually a set of empirical or semi-empirical expressions, which lack a mechanistic development and can, hence, constrain the applicability of the main mathematical model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hohne et al (2019) [36] combined a generalized two-phase flow boiling model with CFD to predict the breakup, coalescence, condensation, and evaporation mechanisms in a heated pipe. Uribe et al (2019) [37] compared three different CFD models (heterogeneous micropores model, pseudo-homogenous catalyst particle model, and single-scale reactor model) in a trickle bed reactor (TBR) to show its multiphysics and multiscale nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past several decades, there have been vast contributions in the study of trickle bed reactors (TBR) hydrodynamics [ 2‐8 ] and mass transfer [ 9‐14 ] phenomena in the literature. In these contributions, it has been recognized that the hydrodynamics of TBR, and therefore the multiphase interactions, play a determining role in the mass and heat transfer phenomena, kinetics, and performance throughput of these systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%