2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2022.112047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale characterization and comparison of historical and modern nuclear graphite grades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, mercury porosimetry has certain limitations in that it assumes that all the pores of graphite are cylindrical. In addition, when the applied pressure exceeds approximately 18.2 MPa, the pores of the graphite internals may be locally deformed or damaged, resulting in high measured porosity [31]. Despite this, mercury porosimetry is still widely used for the measurement of the pore size of graphite.…”
Section: Characterization Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, mercury porosimetry has certain limitations in that it assumes that all the pores of graphite are cylindrical. In addition, when the applied pressure exceeds approximately 18.2 MPa, the pores of the graphite internals may be locally deformed or damaged, resulting in high measured porosity [31]. Despite this, mercury porosimetry is still widely used for the measurement of the pore size of graphite.…”
Section: Characterization Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mercury porosimetry has certain limits in that it is built on the assumption of the pores of graphite that can be regarded as cylinders. In addition, when the applied pressure exceeds approximately 18.2 MPa, the pores of the graphite internals may be locally deformed or damaged, resulting in high measured porosity [23]. Despite this, mercury porosimetry is still widely used for the measurement of pore size of graphite.…”
Section: Characterization Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since part of the iodine on the graphite surface is rapidly released during annealing, and the internal iodine continues to diffuse to the surface, a wide iodine peak appears in all three kinds of graphite at 650 nm from the graphite surface. However, the iodine peak of microporous graphite G500 at 650 nm is not pronounced due to the formation of a stable iodine diffusion channel inside the G500 of the larger pore [10]. At depths greater than 1.4 µm, nanoporous graphite G400 and G450 have less iodine than microporous graphite G500, indicating that pore size is a key factor affecting iodine diffusion performance, and nanoporous graphite has better performance in blocking iodine diffusion than microporous graphite.…”
Section: Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%