2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41437-020-0295-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale landscape genetics of American marten at their southern range periphery

Abstract: American marten (Martes americana) are a conservation priority in many forested regions of North America. Populations are fragmented at the southern edge of their distribution due to suboptimal habitat conditions. Facilitating gene flow may improve population resilience through genetic and demographic rescue. We used a multiscale approach to estimate the relationship between genetic connectivity and landscape characteristics among individuals at three scales in the northeastern United States: regional, subregi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be possible, however, to indirectly mitigate predation risk for martens, other subordinate carnivores, or prey species by decreasing the foraging efficacy of predators (Vanlandeghem et al 2021). At broad (Cushman et al 2011, Zielinski 2014, Aylward et al 2020) and fine scales (Tweedy et al 2019), martens are generally associated with structurally heterogeneous forest cover and often avoid areas with reduced cover (Moriarty et al 2016), rarely enter openings during snow‐free periods (Moriarty et al 2015, Martin et al 2021), and exhibit increased movement rates and energetic expenditures in simplified forest stands (Moriarty et al 2016, Martin et al 2020). Presumably, martens avoid open or structurally homogeneous areas to reduce risk of predation or competition, yet no studies have empirically investigated the influence of forest structure on marten predation risk or encounters with competitors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be possible, however, to indirectly mitigate predation risk for martens, other subordinate carnivores, or prey species by decreasing the foraging efficacy of predators (Vanlandeghem et al 2021). At broad (Cushman et al 2011, Zielinski 2014, Aylward et al 2020) and fine scales (Tweedy et al 2019), martens are generally associated with structurally heterogeneous forest cover and often avoid areas with reduced cover (Moriarty et al 2016), rarely enter openings during snow‐free periods (Moriarty et al 2015, Martin et al 2021), and exhibit increased movement rates and energetic expenditures in simplified forest stands (Moriarty et al 2016, Martin et al 2020). Presumably, martens avoid open or structurally homogeneous areas to reduce risk of predation or competition, yet no studies have empirically investigated the influence of forest structure on marten predation risk or encounters with competitors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, more researches have been conducted on land use, human experience and ecosystem services (Hersperger et al, 2021;Lester et al, 2021;Song et al, 2017). Nevertheless, with the constant climate changes and increasing human activities, the landscape configuration of different regions is continuously changing (Aylward et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2021c). This change could affect the ecological and evolutionary processes of organisms, and even ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the landscape variables impacting gene flow are not consistent across spatial scales (e.g., Anderson et al, 2010;Galpern, Manseau & Wilson, 2012;Hapeman et al, 2017), single-scale studies may overlook or underestimate important patterns of gene flow. As a result, recent studies have emphasized the importance of multiscale examinations of spatial genetic structure (Aylward, Murdoch & Kilpatrick, 2020;Burgess & Garrick, 2020;Kierepka et al, 2020). However, multiscale designs are less straightforward for populations of widespread, vagile, or generalist species due to their broad distribution, high abundance, and population connectivity (Reding et al, 2012;Kierepka & Latch, 2016b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%