2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale random pore network modeling of oil-water two-phase slip flow in shale matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They revealed that the gas and water relative permeability in nanoscale pore network is mainly determined by the total organic carbon (TOC) and wettability of inorganic throats. Apart from the gas and water two-phase flow, the water and oil two-component liquid flow in the pore network was simulated by Cui et al, 298 where the pore network was randomly generated by fitting the pore size distribution (PSD) frequency. The corner film model and bulk fluid models with different slip lengths are utilized to depict the liquid flow behaviors.…”
Section: Pore-scale Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They revealed that the gas and water relative permeability in nanoscale pore network is mainly determined by the total organic carbon (TOC) and wettability of inorganic throats. Apart from the gas and water two-phase flow, the water and oil two-component liquid flow in the pore network was simulated by Cui et al, 298 where the pore network was randomly generated by fitting the pore size distribution (PSD) frequency. The corner film model and bulk fluid models with different slip lengths are utilized to depict the liquid flow behaviors.…”
Section: Pore-scale Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the calculated oil phase permeability has deviation with the experimental data. The main reason is that the difference in the rock structure is not considered in this model . In conclusion, the relative permeability curves calculated by this model fit well with the experimental values, but it needs further study.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Compared to the LSCM, FIB-SEM, and X-ray CT methods, the MRI method is limited by a very obvious disadvantage: an excessively low imaging resolution [74,75]. For tight sandstones and shale rocks, obtaining a large amount of microscopic information with the MRI method is difficult.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Mri)mentioning
confidence: 99%