2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.acha.2015.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale representation of surfaces by tight wavelet frames with applications to denoising

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce a new multiscale representation of surfaces using tight wavelet frames. Both triangular and quadrilateral (quad) surfaces are considered. The multiscale representation for triangulated surfaces is generalized from the nontensor-product tight wavelet frame representation of functions (of two variables) that were introduced in [1], while the tensor-product tight frames of continuous linear B-spline from [63] are used for quad surfaces representation. As one of many possible applicatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have been successfully used in video processing [26], image segmentation [27,28] and classifications [29,30]. More recently, wavelet frames are constructed on non-flat domains such as surfaces [31,32] and graphes [33][34][35][36] with applications to denoising [31,32,36] and classifications [36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been successfully used in video processing [26], image segmentation [27,28] and classifications [29,30]. More recently, wavelet frames are constructed on non-flat domains such as surfaces [31,32] and graphes [33][34][35][36] with applications to denoising [31,32,36] and classifications [36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since tight wavelet frames can provide redundant representations of image data and exhibit substantial ability for feature/texture extraction, they have been successfully applied to various research areas, such as image segmentation [16], [28], image denoising [29]- [31], image restoration [25], [32], and mesh surface reconstruction [33], [34]. For simplicity, we present the main idea of a tight wavelet frame transform concisely.…”
Section: B Tight Wavelet Frame Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The K-SVD algorithm is able to learn a frame ψ ksvd ; however, it has no control over the bounds, due to the fact that it imposes no constraints on frame bounds (the largest and smallest singular values of ψ ksvd ψ ⊤ ksvd ). Parseval tight frames with frame bounds of 1 have been widely used in signal processing [29]- [31]. Thus, we re-formulated the K-SVD optimization problem in our development of a learning algorithm to learn the optimal Parseval tight frame as well as the sparse coefficients from a set of observations.…”
Section: Learning Parseval Frames For Sparse Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%