2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2017.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale structures of Zr-based binary metallic glasses and the correlation with glass forming ability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These advantages offer great potential for applications of MGs [1,2]. Notably, Zr-rich alloys are important MGs due to their strong glass forming ability [3] and outstanding mechanical properties, such as high Young's modulus [4], fracture toughness [5] and elasticity [6]. The superconducting properties of the Zr-Rh system was proposed in 1955, and has subsequently attracted widespread interest [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These advantages offer great potential for applications of MGs [1,2]. Notably, Zr-rich alloys are important MGs due to their strong glass forming ability [3] and outstanding mechanical properties, such as high Young's modulus [4], fracture toughness [5] and elasticity [6]. The superconducting properties of the Zr-Rh system was proposed in 1955, and has subsequently attracted widespread interest [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on FPMD cluster arrangements, we simulated FEM spectra (Fig. 7 c) with virtual probe size 55 57 . For each glass, simulated FEM patterns (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SRO domain, site-resolved average cluster parameters are determined with “X-ray Absorption Fine Structure” (XAFS) 20 22 , 43 (or its combination with XRD 44 46 ); individual atomic positions are imaged with “Atom Probe Tomography” (3D-APT) 47 50 and “Atomic Electron Tomography” (AET) 51 53 , atomic arrangement within individual clusters are determined with “Angstrom Beam Electron Diffraction” (ABED) 54 . In MRO domain, conventional diffraction has limited success due to decreased order 55 57 . MRO domain size can be determined with “Fluctuation Electron Microscopy” (FEM) 58 , 62 ; individual networks are detected with “Nano Beam Electron Diffraction” (NBED) 63 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SRO domain, site-resolved average cluster parameters are determined with "X-ray Absorption Fine Structure" (XAFS) [20][21][22]43 (or its combination with XRD [44][45][46] ); individual atomic positions are imaged with "Atom Probe Tomography" (3D-APT) 47-50 and "Atomic Electron Tomography" (AET) [51][52][53] , atomic arrangement within individual clusters are determined with "Angstrom Beam Electron Diffraction" (ABED) 54 . In MRO domain, conventional diffraction has limited success due to decreased order [55][56][57] . MRO domain size can be determined with "Fluctuation Electron Microscopy" (FEM) [58][59][60][61][62] ; individual networks are detected with "Nano Beam Electron Diffraction" (NBED) 63 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%