2008
DOI: 10.1029/2008jd009876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multisensor satellite observations of aerosol effects on warm clouds

Abstract: [1] A global multisensor satellite examination of aerosol indirect effects on warm oceanic clouds is presented. The study centers on the water path response of cloud to aerosol burden. A unique element of the study is a rigorous rain screening methodology that is utilized to separate the responses of nonraining and raining clouds. It is demonstrated that high aerosol environments are associated with reduced liquid water path in nonprecipitating clouds and that the reduction in liquid water path reduces the alb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
169
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
15
169
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher CCN counts and, hence, smaller cloud droplets result in suppression of warm rain production and, consequently, in increase of the liquid water path (Fig. 5a), which is consistent with the observational study by Lebsock et al (2008) for the case of precipitating clouds. Corresponding relative susceptibility in the fSST case is about twice as high as in the iSST case (4.6 vs. 2.3 g m −3 , or 14 % vs. 7 % with respect to the control).…”
Section: Hydrological Cycle and Cloud Statisticssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Higher CCN counts and, hence, smaller cloud droplets result in suppression of warm rain production and, consequently, in increase of the liquid water path (Fig. 5a), which is consistent with the observational study by Lebsock et al (2008) for the case of precipitating clouds. Corresponding relative susceptibility in the fSST case is about twice as high as in the iSST case (4.6 vs. 2.3 g m −3 , or 14 % vs. 7 % with respect to the control).…”
Section: Hydrological Cycle and Cloud Statisticssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The methodology in a number of studies has included obtaining data for rain and cloud properties from CloudSat and MODIS with a spatial resolution on the order of 1 km, while aerosol data are retrieved from a significantly larger spatial domain (1 • × 1 • ) (Lebsock et al, 2008;Sorooshian et al, 2009aSorooshian et al, , 2010. The effect of wet scavenging is tested using data for the months of June through August (JJA) between 2006-2008 and just the year 2007 within the tropics for shallow cumulus clouds.…”
Section: Wet Scavenging Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The description of all satellite products and data filtering methodology are described extensively elsewhere (Lebsock et al, 2008;Sorooshian et al, 2010). Briefly, data are only used for warm maritime clouds in conditions of single cloud layers.…”
Section: Satellite Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With greater N d smaller droplets are formed, reducing coalescence and inhibiting rain production (Gunn and Phillips, 1957;Squires, 1958). The dynamic response to the rain suppression lengthens the life-time and increases the cloud cover when suppressing precipitation in clouds, at least in the case of shallow heavily drizzling marine stratocumulus (Albrecht, 1989;Rosenfeld et al, 2006;Lebsock et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2011;Goren and Rosenfeld, 2012). In contrast, adding CCN to non-precipitating clouds can enhance their evaporation and mixing with the ambient air due to the decrease in cloud drop size (e.g., Wood, 2007;Jiang et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Ways By Which Aerosols Affect Cloud Microphysical Precipitamentioning
confidence: 99%