2013
DOI: 10.1093/jpids/pit085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multisite Direct Determination of the Potential for Environmental Contamination of Urine Samples Used for Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Infections

Abstract: BackgroundThe detection of a sexually transmitted infection (STI) agent in a urine specimen from a young child is regarded as an indicator of sexual contact. False positives may conceivably arise from the transfer of environmental contaminants in clinic toilet or bathroom facilities into urine specimens.MethodsThe potential for contamination of urine specimens with environmental STI nucleic acid was tested empirically in the male and female toilets or bathrooms at 10 Northern Territory (Australia) clinics, on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of potential sources of environmental contamination of urine samples for diagnosing sexually transmitted chlamydia provides further insight into our findings. Andersson et al swabbed a variety of environmental locations in STI clinic bathrooms, including door handles, locks, doors, walls, toilet flush buttons, and wash basins and taps for evidence of contamination using Aptima 2 Combo Assay (Gen Probe) [19]. They found anywhere from 3.6 to 9.4% of swabs were positive for C. trachomatis, and included sites like door handles and locks, washbasin taps and wash basin edges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of potential sources of environmental contamination of urine samples for diagnosing sexually transmitted chlamydia provides further insight into our findings. Andersson et al swabbed a variety of environmental locations in STI clinic bathrooms, including door handles, locks, doors, walls, toilet flush buttons, and wash basins and taps for evidence of contamination using Aptima 2 Combo Assay (Gen Probe) [19]. They found anywhere from 3.6 to 9.4% of swabs were positive for C. trachomatis, and included sites like door handles and locks, washbasin taps and wash basin edges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed and definitive procedure for the swab collection and analysis is described by Andersson and co-workers (2014). In summary, seven sites within the NT were included: two clinics associated with an NT Government organisation that investigates possible sexual assaults, two “sexual health” clinics in the Darwin and Alice Springs urban areas, two primary health clinics in small “regional” towns, and four primary health clinics in “remote Indigenous” communities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis of this study was the comparison of previously published data concerning STI agents in toilet/bathroom surface swabs (Andersson et al 2014) with corresponding NT Government STI notifications data (Northern Territory Department of Health). The detailed and definitive procedure for the swab collection and analysis is described by Andersson and coworkers (Andersson et al 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis of this study was the comparison of previously published data concerning STI agents in toilet/bathroom surface swabs (Andersson et al 2014) with corresponding NT Government STI notifications data (Northern Territory Department of Health). The detailed and definitive procedure for the swab collection and analysis is described by Andersson and coworkers (Andersson et al 2014). In summary, seven sites within the NT were included: two clinics associated with an NT Government organisation that investigates possible sexual assaults, two "sexual health" clinics in the Darwin and Alice Springs urban areas, two primary health PeerJ reviewing PDF | (2017:03:16907:1:1:ACCEPTED 17 May 2017)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation