Multisource Feedback to Assess Surgical Practice: A Systematic Review

Multisource feedback to graduate nurses: a multimethod study

“…Literature highlights that MSF tools should reflect the preferred behaviour of the group being appraised (Wood et al 2006). Multiple studies have been conducted to ensure validity and feasibility of regularly used MSF instruments within the medical profession (Violato et al 2008, Overeem et al 2010, Al Khalifa et al 2013. Overeem et al (2012) found that raters and graduates must have full confidence in the appraisal criteria and tool before the MSF approach is truly embraced.…”

“…In the 1970s, MSF was adapted for use in the medical profession to assess competence of junior doctors. There is now evidence that Australia, United Kingdom, United States and the Netherlands are using MSF within a number of medical fields (Hill et al 2012, Al Khalifa et al 2013, Donnon et al 2014.…”

History of the Canadian Medical Education Journal

“…Many of them train graduate students at the Masters and PhD levels. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] By 2007 my colleague, Dr. Tyrone Donnon, and I decided that we would lead the way to a new Canadian journal in medical education. We approached many of the major medical education organizations in Canada (the Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada, the Canadian Association for Medical Education, the College of Family Physicians Canada, and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, the Medical Council of Canada) and many of our colleagues at the major university centers.…”

Electronic management of practice assessment data

“…The outcome of the assessment enables the CPSM to determine whether to grant full registration to these physicians or not allow them to continue to practise in the province. Based on best practices, it was determined that a multifaceted approach would be needed to assess all components of a physician's practice using the Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists (CanMEDS) roles and competencies as the guiding framework . The established programme, called the Manitoba Practice Assessment Program (MPAP), was piloted in 2011 and involves five main components: (1) self‐assessment; (2) multisource feedback or 360° feedback; (3) chart audit/chart‐stimulated recall; (4) interviews; and (5) direct observation.…”