2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multisphere-based importance sampling for structural reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although MCS is the most convenient implementation approach, it is extremely time-consuming when dealing with small failure probability and complex numerical models (e.g., fidelity finite element models (FEM)). Meanwhile, tremendous variation techniques of the MCS such as subset simulation [3,4], importance sampling [5,6] and directional sampling [7,8] have been developed to obtain more accurate results with fewer samplings. However, the main drawback of insufficient still exists in those methods.…”
Section: Akmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although MCS is the most convenient implementation approach, it is extremely time-consuming when dealing with small failure probability and complex numerical models (e.g., fidelity finite element models (FEM)). Meanwhile, tremendous variation techniques of the MCS such as subset simulation [3,4], importance sampling [5,6] and directional sampling [7,8] have been developed to obtain more accurate results with fewer samplings. However, the main drawback of insufficient still exists in those methods.…”
Section: Akmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By selecting an appropriate radius, the AHKRA algorithm can concentrate on the area with enough impact on the failure probability, thus avoiding unnecessary function evaluation. x 1…10 = N(0, 1) Multivariate quadratic LS (Thedy and Liao, 2021) 3…”
Section: Mathematical Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%