2021
DOI: 10.7812/tpp/20.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multistage Adolescent Depression Screening: A Comparison of 11-Year-Olds to 12-Year-Olds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the results might not translate to clinicians who care only for children, since the GPs’ attention to parents might have played a role in children’s improvement. Conversely, had screening been a routine clinical practice within the collaborative, detection rates and child outcomes might have been better …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the results might not translate to clinicians who care only for children, since the GPs’ attention to parents might have played a role in children’s improvement. Conversely, had screening been a routine clinical practice within the collaborative, detection rates and child outcomes might have been better …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, had screening been a routine clinical practice within the collaborative, detection rates and child outcomes might have been better. 36 Strengths include enrolling a relatively large number of clinicians of a type commonly providing primary care in countries across the income spectrum 37,38 and demonstrating an impact on a heterogeneous population of children. We were also able to document improvements despite living conditions that worsened markedly during the study.…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This guideline also appears to folow the United States Preventative Task Force’s (2022) determination that there is insufficient evidence to warrant depression screenings at a younger age. In terms of assessments, one study utilizing the PHQ-9A documented no significant differences in completion, mean total scores, or rates of positive screenings that would affect or preclude its use among 11-year-olds ( Cortez et al 2021 ). That study opted to use the adolescent modified versions of the scales (for use among 11–17-year-olds) in light of their established reliability in cross-cultural settings ( Aggarwal et al, 2017 ; Burdzovic Andreas & Brunborg, 2017 ; Naveed et al, 2019 ; Yalın Sapmaz et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%