2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multistimuli Activation of TiO2/α-Alumina Membranes for Degradation of Methylene Blue

Abstract: TiO 2 /α-Al 2 O 3 porous membranes were prepared and tested under different stimuli, including UV and simulated solar irradiation, with or without the addition of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), and by using Methylene Blue (MB) as a model organic pollutant to probe the oxidative catalytic activity of the membranes. An ultrathin TiO 2 layer was coated on porous α-Al 2 O 3 substrates by combining a sol−gel process with a spin coating technique. Uniform TiO 2 -coated alumina surfaces were obtained, which resulted i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The photocatalyst activity of titania can also be evaluated via photocatalytic oxidation of methylene blue (MB) under UV illumination. MB is often used as model for recalcitrant azodye pollutant, and, being a highly colored organic molecule, its photodecomposition can easily be detected in situ through spectrophotometric methods [65].…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Photocatalyst Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photocatalyst activity of titania can also be evaluated via photocatalytic oxidation of methylene blue (MB) under UV illumination. MB is often used as model for recalcitrant azodye pollutant, and, being a highly colored organic molecule, its photodecomposition can easily be detected in situ through spectrophotometric methods [65].…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Photocatalyst Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases WO 3 /BP membranes are able to efficiently degrade the water contaminants with a kinetic constant value of 0.085 ± 0.002, 0.064 ± 0.001, and 0.019 ± 0.001 min −1 , respectively. Such values are of the same order of magnitude or lower than the kinetic constants against the same pollutants, found with WO 3 , TiO 2 , or other catalyst nanoparticles dispersed either in the solutions or casted on carbon nanotubes, flakes of graphene oxide or porous polymer membranes [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ], as no BP bearing photocatalysts, to the knowledge of authors, was ever proposed in literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Methylene blue is a reference material used in the evaluation of the photocatalytic activity of inorganic materials under UV radiation as described in “ISO 10678:2010Determination of photocatalytic activity of surfaces in an aqueous medium by degradation of methylene blue”, which was last reviewed in 2017 and remains current. For visible-light-driven photocatalysis, methylene blue is also commonly employed to help gauge the photocatalytic performance of photocatalysts, especially when dye-assisted-sensitization could be achieved. Sensitizing semiconductor/metal nanoparticles with dyes to harvest visible photons represents an excellent way to enhance the photocatalytic activity of a photocatalyst. In water, methylene blue exhibits a strong absorption peak at 664 nm (“red light”) and therefore may be employed as a sensitizer under solar radiation or visible light.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In water, methylene blue exhibits a strong absorption peak at 664 nm (“red light”) and therefore may be employed as a sensitizer under solar radiation or visible light. In 2017, Cabir et al successfully sensitized TiO 2 nanopowders with Cu-phthalocyanine, which helped enhance the photodegradation of methylene blue under visible light while Mastropietro et al employed in situ sensitization approach to improve the degradation rates of methylene blue over a TiO 2 /α-Al 2 O 3 photocatalyst under solar radiation. , In our system, methylene blue was employed as a model organic pollutant to probe the oxidative catalytic activity of In­(OH) 3 /Ag/C, but it was not acting as a sensitizing agent because methylene blue did not absorb UVC effectively and therefore not able to function as a sensitizer. It would be interesting to test the In­(OH) 3 /Ag/C photocatalyst under both UVC and visible light in the future for the purpose of performance optimization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%