2022
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multitrophic diversity and biotic associations influence subalpine forest ecosystem multifunctionality

Abstract: Biodiversity across multiple trophic levels is required to maintain multiple ecosystem functions. Yet it remains unclear how multitrophic diversity and species interactions regulate ecosystem multifunctionality. Here, combining data from 9 different trophic groups (including trees, shrubs, herbs, leaf mites, small mammals, bacteria, pathogenic fungi, saprophytic fungi, and symbiotic fungi) and 13 ecosystem functions related to supporting, provisioning, and regulating services, we used a multitrophic perspectiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the functional contributions of species and their assemblages might not be equal across different functions (Cadotte et al, 2017; Hautier et al, 2018; Mori et al, 2016; Wagg et al, 2021). This is especially likely in non‐experimental natural systems (so‐called real‐world systems) (Mori et al, 2018), where species assemblages are largely variable both in space and time (Magurran & McGill, 2011), and abiotic drivers also directly or indirectly influence ecosystem processes (Hagan et al, 2021; Luo et al, 2022; van der Plas, 2019). Although knowledge about the diversity‐multifunctionality linkages originally comes from experimental plant communities, it is now increasingly recognized as being common across different organism groups and beyond manipulated systems (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the functional contributions of species and their assemblages might not be equal across different functions (Cadotte et al, 2017; Hautier et al, 2018; Mori et al, 2016; Wagg et al, 2021). This is especially likely in non‐experimental natural systems (so‐called real‐world systems) (Mori et al, 2018), where species assemblages are largely variable both in space and time (Magurran & McGill, 2011), and abiotic drivers also directly or indirectly influence ecosystem processes (Hagan et al, 2021; Luo et al, 2022; van der Plas, 2019). Although knowledge about the diversity‐multifunctionality linkages originally comes from experimental plant communities, it is now increasingly recognized as being common across different organism groups and beyond manipulated systems (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on complex trophic webs has demonstrated that increases in the number of associations are concomitant with the increase of species richness (Luo et al., 2022). Consistent with this research, our findings showed that greater plant–fungal species richness were positively correlated with plant–fungus network complexity (Figure S9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil ecosystem multifunctionality (SMF) indices, which are often used to provide a quantitative assessment of soil function, may be effective tools for summarizing these extremely complex and interactive processes (Delgado‐Baquerizo et al., 2016; Fan et al., 2023; Soliveres et al., 2016). Soil microbial diversity may potentially drive forest SMF (Delgado‐Baquerizo et al., 2020; Luo et al., 2022; Schuldt et al., 2018). These findings are crucial in aiding our enhanced comprehension of the relationship between soil microbial diversity and forest SMF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%