2007
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.75.022330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiuser quantum communication networks

Abstract: We study a quantum state transfer between spins interacting with an arbitrary network of spins coupled by uniform XX interactions. It is shown that in such a system under fairly general conditions, we can expect a nearly perfect transfer of states. Then we analyze a generalization of this model to the case of many network users, where the sender can choose which party he wants to communicate with by appropriately tuning his local magnetic field. We also remark that a similar idea can be used to create an entan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
102
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Engineering the coupling between spins can improve the transport fidelity 4 , even allowing for perfect quantum state transport (QST), but it is difficult to achieve in experimental systems. Remarkable work 5,6 found relaxed coupling engineering requirements -however, even these proposals still required linear chains with nearest-neighbor couplings 7,8 or networks will all equal couplings 9 . These requirements remain too restrictive to allow an experimental implementation, since manufacturing highly regular networks is challenging with current technology [10][11][12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Engineering the coupling between spins can improve the transport fidelity 4 , even allowing for perfect quantum state transport (QST), but it is difficult to achieve in experimental systems. Remarkable work 5,6 found relaxed coupling engineering requirements -however, even these proposals still required linear chains with nearest-neighbor couplings 7,8 or networks will all equal couplings 9 . These requirements remain too restrictive to allow an experimental implementation, since manufacturing highly regular networks is challenging with current technology [10][11][12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in crystals) with almost no fabrication requirements. In large networks, the end-spins are intrinsincally weakly coupled to the bulk network, allowing the use of a perturbative approach to describe the transport dynamics in this weak-coupling regime [5][6][7][8][9]14 . We identify two different scenarios for engineering perfect transport: the endspins could be set far off-resonance from the rest of the network -transport is then driven by a second-order process and hence is slow, but it requires no active control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roughly * pascualox@gmail.com speaking, the resulting QST takes place in two distinct regimes: For very weak coupling, the bulk chain behaves merely like an information bus without being appreciably populated, and the probability amplitude of finding the excitation undergoes an effective Rabi oscillation between the sender and the receiver [16][17][18][19][20]; whereas, for nonperturbative end-point couplings, the relevant modes taking part in the quantum state dynamics reside mainly in the linear zone of the spectrum, thus, minimizing the effect of dispersion so that QST occurs in the so-called ballistic regime [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second depends on the weak interaction of boundary spins to the remainders (bulk spins), making the bulk spins almost un-excited during the time evolution. The dynamics in the second method can be viewed as an effective Rabi oscillation between the boundary spins [15,[17][18][19]. In the other sort of schemes, such as modulating the Larmor frequencies on sites [20] or adding external potentials [21] to the spin chain, perfect state transfer can be obtained only for a fixed time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%