“…19,20 However, selective and sensitive detection of aqueous contaminant TNP in presence of competing nitro analytes poses great challenge, in view of the said analyte's high electron affinity facilitating false response. [21][22][23] Current explosive detection methods including trained canines and modern analytical techniques such as, highpressure liquid chromatography, 24 surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, 25 amperometry, 26 energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, 27 electrochemistry, 28 cyclic voltammetry, 29 etc., although significant, but suffers from common drawbacks like cumbersome pretreatment of samples, interference from other compounds, low sensitivity, high operational cost, sophisticated instrumentation, and portability issues during infield use. 2,24 On the flipside, fluorescent probe based method harnessed from photoluminescence (PL)-based chemosensors possess unparalleled sensitivity, selectivity, low instrumentation cost, portability, short response time, and dual compatibility in solid and solution media.…”