1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4539(199803/04)27:2<87::aid-xrs256>3.0.co;2-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate analysis of statistically poor EDXRD spectra for the detection of concealed explosives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19,20 However, selective and sensitive detection of aqueous contaminant TNP in presence of competing nitro analytes poses great challenge, in view of the said analyte's high electron affinity facilitating false response. [21][22][23] Current explosive detection methods including trained canines and modern analytical techniques such as, highpressure liquid chromatography, 24 surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, 25 amperometry, 26 energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, 27 electrochemistry, 28 cyclic voltammetry, 29 etc., although significant, but suffers from common drawbacks like cumbersome pretreatment of samples, interference from other compounds, low sensitivity, high operational cost, sophisticated instrumentation, and portability issues during infield use. 2,24 On the flipside, fluorescent probe based method harnessed from photoluminescence (PL)-based chemosensors possess unparalleled sensitivity, selectivity, low instrumentation cost, portability, short response time, and dual compatibility in solid and solution media.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 However, selective and sensitive detection of aqueous contaminant TNP in presence of competing nitro analytes poses great challenge, in view of the said analyte's high electron affinity facilitating false response. [21][22][23] Current explosive detection methods including trained canines and modern analytical techniques such as, highpressure liquid chromatography, 24 surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, 25 amperometry, 26 energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, 27 electrochemistry, 28 cyclic voltammetry, 29 etc., although significant, but suffers from common drawbacks like cumbersome pretreatment of samples, interference from other compounds, low sensitivity, high operational cost, sophisticated instrumentation, and portability issues during infield use. 2,24 On the flipside, fluorescent probe based method harnessed from photoluminescence (PL)-based chemosensors possess unparalleled sensitivity, selectivity, low instrumentation cost, portability, short response time, and dual compatibility in solid and solution media.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in order to crack down on this criminal activity, developing effective methods and instruments to identify body packing has been widely focused. Energy dispersive X-ray diffraction (EDXRD) has been shown to be a suitable technique to detect explosives and drugs in baggage [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Besides, the diffraction profile is another important feature, because spectra resulting from the scattering media's diffraction effects are superimposed on the incident spectra to produce a unique diffraction profile. It can be regarded as the 'fingerprint' of the detected object, which has been demonstrated previously [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, fast and reliable detection of trace TNT has attracted considerable attentions [5]. Various analytical techniques, including gas chromatography [6,7], high performance liquid chromatography [8,9], voltammetry [10,11], ion mobility spectrometry [12,13], mass spectrometry [14,15], energy dispersive X-ray diffraction [16,17], surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy [18,19], and surface plasmon resonance [20][21][22], just name a few, have been applied in the detection of trace amounts of TNT. These techniques are all effective, but the requirement of complicated analytical instruments, lengthy and tedious operation procedures of these methods exclude their application in on-site analysis, especially in emergencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%