2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate and integrative approach to analyze multiple biomarkers in ecotoxicology: A field study in Neotropical region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Geophagus brasiliensis , in a Brazilian River, had an increase of DNA damage associated with Fe, Mn, Cd, Cu, and Pb ( Gomes et al., 2019 ). Ghisi et al. (2017) found a higher frequency of DNA damage in Astyanax aff.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Geophagus brasiliensis , in a Brazilian River, had an increase of DNA damage associated with Fe, Mn, Cd, Cu, and Pb ( Gomes et al., 2019 ). Ghisi et al. (2017) found a higher frequency of DNA damage in Astyanax aff.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Geophagus brasiliensis, in a Brazilian River, had an increase of DNA damage associated with Fe, Mn, Cd, Cu, and Pb (Gomes et al, 2019). Ghisi et al (2017) found a higher frequency of DNA damage in Astyanax aff. paranae located in a site downstream of the urban area, which received a mix of pollutants, including industrial and municipal wastewater.…”
Section: Genotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Fish exposed to chlorpyrifos showed a significant increase in CAT activity in gills (Figure 3D), which generally indicates activation of the antioxidant defense system, preventing oxidative stress (Clemente et al 2010; Ghisi et al 2017). This recorded induction may be sufficient to cope with oxidative stress induced by the toxic substance because no significant increase was found in the levels of LPO, as has been reported in another study (Almeida and Oliveira 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Passive monitoring refers to organisms sampled in local populations whereas active implies the exposure of organisms in sites to be monitored for a period of time. Nevertheless, most of the biomonitoring surveys developed until now have been focused on the passive monitoring methodology, with the use of vertebrates and invertebrates (Ghisi et al, 2017;Ronci et al, 2016;Ruchter and Sures, 2015), as well as some aquatic plants species (Bonanno et al, 2017;Demirezen and Aksoy, 2004;Gonzalez et al, 2013;Harguinteguy et al, 2016;P erez et al, 2017) as bioindicators. Passive biomonitoring has been widely used for its sampling simplicity, long-term measurements and existing guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%