2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2013.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate assessment of activated sludge stability in lab-scale experiments

Abstract: Postprint)version)of)paper)published)in)Process)Biochemistry)2013,)vol.)48(11),)p.)1789-1793.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Little literature about quantification methods for the acclimation period is available. A few studies suggested univariate and multivariate assessment approaches using the biochemical, physical, and morphological characteristics of AS [ 22 , 23 ]. These approaches suggest 20–40 days of minimal periods for microcosm startups (one to two times the SRT in the settings), comparable to those (1.7–2.4 the SRT) measured in our study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Little literature about quantification methods for the acclimation period is available. A few studies suggested univariate and multivariate assessment approaches using the biochemical, physical, and morphological characteristics of AS [ 22 , 23 ]. These approaches suggest 20–40 days of minimal periods for microcosm startups (one to two times the SRT in the settings), comparable to those (1.7–2.4 the SRT) measured in our study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previous studies have documented phenotype changes during AS microcosm startups [ 22 , 23 ], the time-dependent shifts in the community structure, diversity, and composition during startups remain to be further investigated. 16S rRNA gene-based community profiling was thus carried out for the I (at day 0) and AS samples of A, G, and S taken at day 28 (right after the acclimation period) and day 77, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly, in order to solve the number of problems occurring during activated sludge studies, it is reasonable to conduct investigations in a laboratory scale. The transfer from the industrial to laboratory scale requires a period of adaptation of the activated sludge community to the conditions of the SBR [19,20]. The adaptation period should be neither too short, or else sludge will not be stabilized, nor too long, or else experiment will be time consuming.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Setting of adaptation regimes and periods makes it possible to conduct the research without considering the reaction of activated sludge to stress caused by repeated volume reductions and stabilization of the main factors. To avoid mistakes in the experimental results, it is important to assess quantitatively in advance whether conditions in the activated sludge have stabilized [19,20]. The common practice assumes that the optimal period for adaptation lasts 2-2.5 sludge ages [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…can be measured on-line, and it is difficult (or even impossible) to build a mechanistic process model. Given the complexity of biological systems and the lack of quantitative analysis about the underlying mechanisms, multivariate statistical techniques have offered effective tools for bioprocess supervision [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%