Multivariate Assessment of Marginal Fit Concerning Two Types of Dental Inlays Obtained Through Two CAD-CAM Technology Scanning Methods - an in vitro Follow-up Study

Negucioiu, Marius; Popa, Daniela; Condor, Daniela; Culcitchi, Cristian; Prodan, Doina; Moldovan, Mărioara; Buduru, Smaranda

doi:10.37358/rc.19.9.7503

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The risk of bias of included studies is summarized in Table 2. All studies presented low to medium risk of bias, except for one that presented high risk of bias [54].…”

Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…direct view with optical or electronic scanning, used by eleven studies [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]; -indirect view on epoxy resin replicas, used by two studies [55,56]; -silicone replica technique and optical scanning, used by four studies [57][58][59][60]; -micro-CT analysis, used by two studies [61,62]; -silicone replica technique and 3D analysis, used by three studies [63,64]; -triple scan technique, used by one study [65]. Internal fit was assessed by 9 studies using one of the following methods:…”

Section: Description Of the Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessment Methods for Marginal and Internal Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Systematic Review

Di Fiore,

Zuccon,

Carraro

et al. 2023

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Different methods are used for the analysis of marginal and internal fit of partial crowns, but not all of them are applicable for in vivo studies. The aim of this review is to search the available methods, described in the current literature, to assess marginal and internal fit in partial crowns. Methods: an electronic search was performed on Pubmed and Web of Science databases to find studies published from 1 January 2017 up to 2 March 2023, following PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews. The search strategy applied was: “(marginal) AND (fit OR gap OR adaptation OR discrepancy) AND (inlay OR onlay OR partial crown)”. In vitro studies which evaluated marginal and internal fit on CAD CAM or 3D printed partial crowns were included in this review. Quality of the studies was assessed by using Quality Assessment Tool For In Vitro Studies (QUIN tool). Results: 22 studies were included. Among conventional methods, direct view with microscope, indirect view on resin replicas, and silicone replica technique (SRT) were used. Considering new digital methods, micro-CT, SRT 3D and triple scan technique (TST) were applied. Conclusions: Among 2D methods, direct view technique is the most used marginal fit analysis. For a more comprehensive evaluation, a 3D digital analysis is suggested. SRT and indirect view are the only 2D methods available for in vivo analysis. A protocol for the application of TST for assessment in vivo is now available, but no studies are reported in literature yet.

show abstract

“…The risk of bias of included studies is summarized in Table 2. All studies presented low to medium risk of bias, except for one that presented high risk of bias [54].…”

Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 98%